• Homicidal_Pingu@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thing is it’s a private company and you are under no obligation to buy their products. Let customers choose what they want. They’re also not doing this industry wide so it’s really not benefitting people

    • SoldantTheCynic@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is the EU and probably Australia don’t care for this kind of corporate apologism and recognise the danger of complete platform lockdown. This just increases customer choice within a platform. If you actually cared about choice you’d applaud it.

      • Logicalist@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are offering something no one else is, the EU want’s to remove it from the market and people who value choice should applaud it?

        • SoldantTheCynic@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What are they offering? A closed platform that arbitrarily stops perfectly valid apps over idiotic concerns of “competition”?

          When people say Apple fans are sheep this is what they mean.

          • Logicalist@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I want companies like microsoft, adobe, and others to go through the app store, because otherwise they’re a fucking plague on the system and install a bunch of stupid shit that is hard to get rid off.

            But if they go through apples system, getting rid of things is really quite easy.

            Probably not as much of an issue on iOS, but if macOS is any indication of what’s in store for sideloading, no fucking thanks, I’d much prefer my walled garden.

            "When people say Apple fans are sheep this is what they mean.

            there are words for people that talk like this as well, hint none of them are pleasant.

    • Direct_Card3980@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you forgetting that Australia isn’t Somalia? They have laws and regulations around competition. If Apple wants to do business in Australia they have to follow the law. “But I don’t want to!” isn’t a good argument.

    • Outrageous-Nothing42@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually no. It’s a major computing platform. Your argument is flawed. By you saying this is ok for apple then you must also be ok with the possibility that tomorrow Microsoft can do the same to windows and apple can do it to osx and google to android. What’s good for one has to be acceptable for all. Eventually every platform can be locked to one and only one source of apps completely killing competition.

      • Homicidal_Pingu@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Argument is flawed how? You are not required to use Apple devices or services. I would argue that their products are a premium purchase if anything. They are nowhere near a majority marketshare in any sector they compete in.

        That’s up to them. There are still other options.

        • iMacmatician@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Majority marketshare ≠ major computing platform.

          You will always have the option to use only the App Store.

    • firelitother@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The EU is also under no obligation to cater to Apple’s walled garden. Open up or don’t sell in the EU.