• db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It came down to Wi-Fi and Bluetooth to be the wireless network standard. For a hot minute it wasn’t clear who would come out the winner.

    I can’t find shit about it though. It was around 2000ish.

    • Gray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re probably thinking about homerf, which was the competitor to WiFi. I don’t think Bluetooth was ever marketed as an alternative to WiFi.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bluetooth has it’s own stack. Wifi typically runs tcpip. Your post doesn’t even make sense because both wifi and Bluetooth coexist today so clearly there was no “winner”.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You aren’t crazy. I remember this being posited as a wifi alternative too. They claimed you could have a Bluetooth signal that wouldn’t reach beyond the walls of your home, preventing outside people (neighbors etc) from piggybacking on your network even if they had a password or the network was open because of the short range. And that tech does sort of exist today. A lot of mesh wifi routers use Bluetooth to connect to each other and provide that wifi to you in whatever part of your home you happen to be in. IOT devices do this as well. I believe this was called a piconet. But it never caught on, and I think it was more a theoretical idea than an actual real push.

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh wow, I’m glad Bluetooth lost given that it’s vastly inferior. I mean we’re even starting to see wifi headphones now, soon Bluetooth will be relegated to legacy devices.