• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I generally agree, but the devil is in the details. An order of magnitude more casualties would be approximately the entire Russian army and its reservists. It’s currently thought that an army loses operational efficacy at 30-40% losses.

    • at_an_angle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Assuming the Russian army had any operational efficiency to begin with.

    • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looking at WW2 numbers, they still have some way to go and I suppose you don’t need to worry too much about defending other borders, as long as you giver a finger over the nuclear suicide button.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why should we suppose that the current Russian military is as resilient as the Soviet one was?

        Come to that, why should we suppose even their nukes are in similar condition?

        It’s been decades of essentially government by organized crime and kleptocracy in Russia. Their shit is wack, in the parlance.