• doo@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, but it does. True, they have no regard for human casualties, but even with their population, they cannot maintain the meatwaves forever.

    Let’s have a look. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Russia

    So, 47% of their population is male. Out of 145 million of bodies they posses, males are 68 million. The percentage of 18-44 year olds is 35. That’s 23 million potential soldiers.

    Omg, that’s one massive army, one would say.

    But this is russia, we’re talking about.

    In June 2009, the Public Chamber of Russia reported over 500,000 alcohol-related deaths annually. They have 1.3% of population dying every year. In 2009 it meant about 1.8 million dead. 25% of those were alcohol related. That’s only deaths.

    They improved, but an average russian is still a professional alcoholic. Let’s assume that a whooping 80% of those 23 millions are actually relatively healthy. That’s 18 million potential soldiers.

    Still a lot.

    But it’s still russia.

    Apart from alcohol, it’s famous for the widespread thievery. I’m not joking. https://ru-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Пьют_и_воруют?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    The big difference is that for last 9 years, Ukraine was at war with russia, while russia was enjoying its second army of the world status. In other words they were stealing as usual.

    So yes, one can think that it is impossible to fight against an army of 18 million. But russia started this war with 800k and two years later, lost already half of them, bumped the army to two million and still is making an occasional 200 meters of progress only to lose them in a week.

    Ukraine still not losing and not planning to, is what matters.