• toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s dishonest. I should say it’s discussion with the evidence that lead op to their point.

      Using their data and our data leads us to an agreeable middle ground.

      • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.infoOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was referring to his edit which is:

        Edit: Oh god… It’s Rossman. Of course it’s dishonest.

        And my argument was that it’s fine to disagree with him (especially if you have conflicting evidence), but I don’t think that it’s warranted to call Rossmann dishonest


        By the way, I don’t even necessarily disagree with his main opinion, the video title is clickbaity for sure

        • toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know that’s fair and I appreciate your follow up. I personally need to do some research on Rossman so for that thank you