I was using Bing to create a list of countries to visit. Since I have been to the majority of the African nation on that list, I asked it to remove the african countries…

It simply replied that it can’t do that due to how unethical it is to descriminate against people and yada yada yada. I explained my resoning, it apologized, and came back with the same exact list.

I asked it to check the list as it didn’t remove the african countries, and the bot simply decided to end the conversation. No matter how many times I tried it would always experience a hiccup because of some ethical process in the bg messing up its answers.

It’s really frustrating, I dunno if you guys feel the same. I really feel the bots became waaaay too tip-toey

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or it’s been configured to operate within these bounds because it is far far better for them to have a screenshot of it refusing to be racist, even in a situation that’s clearly not, than it is for it to go even slightly racist.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, precisely. They’ve gone so overboard with trying to avoid potential issues that they’ve severely handicapped their AI in other ways.

      I had quite a fun time exploring exactly which things chatGPT has been forcefully biased on by entering a template prompt over and over, just switching out a single word for ethnicity/sex/religion/animal etc. and comparing the responses. This made it incredibly obvious when the AI was responding differently.

      It’s a lot of fun, except for the part where companies are now starting to use these AIs in practical applications.

      • HardlightCereal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you said the agenda of these people putting in the racism filters is one where facts don’t matter. Are you asserting that antiracism is linked with misinformation?

        • Iceblade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Kindly don’t claim that I said or asserted things that I didn’t. I would consider that to be rather rude.

            • Iceblade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you said the agenda of these people putting in the racism filters is one where facts don’t matter.

              This quote from your previous comment is a statement, not a question, just like the one you now posted, false. You seem to have an unfortunate tendency to make claims that are incorrect. My condolences.

              • HardlightCereal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh, sorry, I thought you were asking me not to make claims about what you asserted, since that made a lick of sense. Because the alternative is that you’re bald-facedly lying.