Could Bitcoin Millhouse be even less likeable? Yes, the answer is yes.

  • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can’t the Speaker shut that shit down? Especially since he’s admitted exactly what he plans to do?

    • Oderus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Based solely on the merit of the amendments they’ve proposed, such as changing titles or a single word, they should face some sort of punishment for wasting precious time. It’s clearly meant to do nothing but waste time and guess who pays for it?

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaker does that and next time it’ll be amendments created by ChatGPT. Long ones. It’s hard to have a process that cannot be weaponized or deadlocked without removing the process entirely. Or, well, relying on people being good actors.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is kind of the fundamental weakness of our system, it relies heavily on people acting in relatively good faith.