I’ve seen that some instances have already done it preemptively.

        • Falken@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yes. What they specifically did though was extend the protocol so that anyone who wasn’t using their version of XMPP via Google Talk would be incompatible or seem “broken” when it really wasn’t. It’s just that they were using non-standard features, both incentivizing people to just switch to Google Talk and for development on the core protocol to slow down.

          I bet money Threads is going to do the same thing. They’ll introduce Threads only features that don’t work with all the standard Activitypub implementations, causing frustration with Thread users and putting pressure on people to just jump ship to Threads from standard Activitypub implementations.

    • _spiffy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t see a point in defederating. As long as the only data they get is the content of my posts and votes and replies I don’t care. More people in the fediverse strengthens it and splitting up into kingdoms is basically what we have now. Defederation should be done only if being federated is harmful to the users here.

    • Smk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s more about protecting ActivityPub protocol than anything.

      Before we know it, thread will impose its proprietary protocol and the fediverse will simply die with it.

      Honestly, I’m not sure if it will happen. Social media is already pretty much corporate world so we will see what will happen.

        • Smk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          I think it’s about keeping the userbase on ActivityPub as much as possible. When meta will start doing ActivityPub and probably change it, everyone will need to follow because Meta will own all the userbase and “subreddit”.

          At some point, they will decide to drop ActivityPub because it’s not good enough for what they want to do. Just like what Google did to XMPP. And maybe Google was right about XMPP, I don’t know.

          Another reason is what you are saying, a personnal battle against Meta and big corp.

          At the end of the day, will anything the fediverse Admin do will matter ? Only time will tell I guess.

          One key difference with HTTP is just like TCP. Everyone uses it so it’s much harder to just change it and fuck everyone else. ActivityPub is an easier target for this strategy.