• new_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Donation is one thing completely different than selling their fluids. There’s no incentive to exploit people when there’s not a payback in cash.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And people sell them too already. They aren’t exploited.

      Yeah there will be people that try to abuse it, that applies to literally everything in life and should never be the reason to not do something.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Unless they are forced to it can’t be exploitation.

          Now if they work health benefits into instead of just paying better wages, that would be more on the exploitation side. But thats the bad eggs ruining it for the other 98% that don’t abuse it.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s definitely exploitation. you just don’t like the connotation. they are being exploited for their blood just like a well is exploited for oil a mountain is exploited for minerals and forests are exploited for wood.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Exploit has multiple meanings, exploiting a resource and exploiting someone in an underhand or unfair way do have the same phrase to explain them. But exploiting a resource is obviously much different than treating workers unfairly.

              Verbs and nouns typically have different meanings for the same word, maybe time for an English refresher.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m using it correctly. don’t be condescending. you might think it’s a fair exploitation, but it’s exploitation nonetheless.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not your decision it make. Hazard pay exists for a reason, many people view that as exploitation as well. Doesn’t make it so, sorry.

                  Words have different meanings, and you missed the mark thinking it was like mining.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                since you clearly went to a dictionary, you can see none of the definitions even mention “force”.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are other words in the definitions that mean the same.

                  What do you think unfair and underhanded means….?

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    to be clear, my definition is correct, and you are objecting to the connotation of other definitions. this is very much your problem .

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                mounds and greens have nothing to do with this. we are only using the transitive verb here.