• @Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Interesting. NAL, but I wonder if you are in legal trouble for game piracy if you could motion to dismiss due to their lack of standing due to this report…

  • @Newstart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    511 year ago

    I think the goal is not to actually get the identities since their lawyers probably told them they won’t be able to get them. The goal is to rather scare the next user who would be tempted to share his piracy tools and tips . If you scare enough people from sharing because they realize there is no anonymity , you by default reduce the amount if piracy.

  • BOMBS
    link
    fedilink
    401 year ago

    “We’re not rich enough. I need more.”

  • Spaceman Spiff
    link
    fedilink
    281 year ago

    Isn’t there some sort of statute of limitations here? 12 years is an awfully long time

    • Muddybulldog
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Sounds more like they’re going after Grande. Belief being the testimony would allow them to build a case that Grande incited or somehow induced privacy which would strip them from a number of legal protections that may apply to service providers.

  • CALIGVLA
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    Good luck, bozos. What are you gonna do? Extradite me to the US?

  • @CeruleanRuin
    link
    19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I will never take these companies’ side over a noble sailor of the high seas, but I took a look at the movies produced by Millennium Media, and they need every red cent they can get. They’re certainly not getting them from tickets or rentals. Good lord, I haven’t seen so much ripe stinking dogshit since the summer I spent clean cages at the animal shelter.

    How humiliating to get copyright swatted for downloading something from the studio that brought you such timeless classics as The Prince & Me: The Elephant Adventure and Day of the Dead: Bloodline.

  • Only 6? Really? I’m pretty sure /r/piracy existed and had more users than that in 2011.

    Shit… I could be one. I got banned from /r/Gaming around that time just for telling someone what specific .BIN file to search for to get their playstation emulator running, despite others mentioning the same thing and their rules only saying you can’t post links.

    • mintyfrog
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      My guess is it’s 6 users that they’ve identified as doing a bunch of distribution but only have their reddit names to identify them

    • @gd42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      They aren’t going after the users, they are suing the ISP. The comments are about the ISP’s leniency towards torrenting, so they are trying to find the users to validate their claims and add the comments as evidence to the case.

  • minkshaman
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Apparently this is the second time they’ve tried, and they’ve come with no new compelling case.

    Maybe they think that Musk-lite will help them this time?

  • @trifictional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    I talked about piracy a whole bunch in the switch piracy subreddit.

    Wonder if I’ll get sued in 10-15 years for it along with the 1000s of others.

  • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol, it’s entirely possible that that info has rusted away in the intervening decade, even if Reddit wanted to comply. This is a scare tactic.

    • Spaceman Spiff
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      There’s plenty of good business reasons not to want to deal with these requests. Even if the first ones would be easier to just turn over, the 1000th, or millionth gets overwhelming

      • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        There’s plenty of good business reasons not to want to deal with these requests.

        reddit is not known for making sound business decisions.