Formerly u/CanadaPlus101 on Reddit.

  • 67 Posts
  • 9.37K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • You think they’re hiring you because you’re white? Nah, they’re hiring the dude whose dad golfs with the CEO. And if you’re not in the right tax bracket, you don’t even exist to them.

    Except to the degree whiteness is part of being “default”, which is a desirable trait in a hire, like personal familiarity. If the rich person or people ever becomes too aware of this, a rich, educated, culturally assimilated but brown token hire is the most likely outcome.

    Of course, there’s more flexibility if they’re hiring for a less in-demand job.

    And let’s not pretend this is just a white people thing. A lot of wealthy people of color are just as classist. Sometimes worse. I’ve seen Indian millionaires in the U.S. and in India treat working-class people like absolute trash. Same with rich Latinos, rich Black folks, rich Asians. They’ll look down on people from their own communities like they’re somehow better Look at really bad and oppressive countries: the powerful and the rich are doing everything in their power to make their own people’s lives worse.

    It’s true, class has been a default characteristic of everything beyond a basic hunter-gatherer society.

    To do a bit of a nerdy digression, though, it is totally different in other place (or times, 1930’s rich guys were definitely openly racist). In Anglophone North America, there has been a conscious effort to separate class from things like race, religion, gender and sexual preference. Other places that’s not necessarily so, there might be more than one equally dominant group, and they might track something like caste that doesn’t even exist in the West. But yeah, they definitely still do classism.


  • Of course, this takes all words as equiprobable; results would be different if including the odds of a word appearing in the text into the maths.

    I feel like it works more like 90% of the time when it comes up, so maybe this. And could it be that the words where “ie” appears are more ambiguous somehow, like don’t fit neatly into some existing pattern?

    I don’t remember the “after c” bit ever being of use, though, so that part totally makes sense.

    Edit: For an example, I’d never forget the spelling of “either”, because it’s so common and initial letters are more memorable. But, “piece” is tricky - “peice” is my first instinct, and I literally say “i before e” in my head when I write it now.





  • The networking level is solved by Tor and similar, open protocols are still standard at the transport level, and the application layer is served by Linux, the Fediverse and so much more. I think the hardware level is where future efforts are the most needed. That and just resisting the change as much as possible.

    (It’s not a level of abstraction, but if it was less of a mess crypto would deserve a mention as an authoritarianism-resistant way to keep funding going. Both for whatever future dystopian blackmarket, and for the providers of the infrastructure supporting it)





  • They’re definitely going to run out of money eventually, and this isn’t a highly disciplined and ideological place where they can push through desperate measures to keep going. There’s been efforts towards becoming that that during the war, but Russia has been doing the controlled chaos mafia state thing for quite a while, and I doubt it will be enough.

    But yes, OP seems pretty anecdotal and I’m not going to put too much weight on it.