• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 年前

    Where are you getting this information and if it’s true? Even if it’s true, Meta isn’t known for sticking with what works for the user, but what works for their shareholders. They will figure out a way to exploit and/or extinguish the fediverse.

    In the cruise ship analogy, they will stay on the boat the first few 3 or 4 times so everyone backs down and then they’ll open the bridge for all 5k. None of this rocket science.

    Why do you want them here so bad?

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        I think that widespread adoption of open protocols like ActivityPub are a good thing.

        Why is it a good thing?

        Edit: I should clarify this question. You’re saying you like open discourse, etc., but if threads EEE’s the crap out of the fediverse, then this side is gone and you’re killing off open discourse. Also, corporations like meta, are closed discourse.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          It keeps things open to competition. It prevents situations like we saw with Reddit, where single organizations are able to gatekeep content and force everyone to use their portals to access it.

          • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 年前

            meta is a closed discourse and privately owned, so is reddit. This is user and volunteer run, why would you expose the user and volunteer ran place to closed and greedy companies to do that here?

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 年前

              The whole point of this thread is that Meta is opening up by implementing AcitivtyPub support, people are responding with hostility towards that, and as part of their justification for that hostility they’re accusing Meta of being closed.

              This is insane.

                • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  Truly a dizzying series of logical leaps.

                  No, I am not an employee of Meta or any of its subsidiaries. Even though I’m not 100% opposed to everything they ever do. Do you think there’s no possibility of nuance on a subject like this, anyone who doesn’t completely hate Meta and oppose all of their actions must be secretly working for them?

                  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 年前

                    The hard time I’m warning you of, has just begun. Have fun with your nuance when meta craps all over you one way or another. Have a nice holiday, fr.

        • 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Meta can not EEE the fediverse. The worst they can do is create their own distinct fediverse. But anyone who doesn’t want to participate will still be using the open fediverse. They can’t take your instance or force it to update to their standards.