Hi all! As promised, here is the proposed text of the newest version of the rules. The staff has gone through like eight drafts and literally thousands and thousands of matrix posts to get here, so please be kind. You can see @limeey’s comment on the transparency post if you want more insight into how this sausage was made.

We are opening these rules to commentary from the community before they go into effect. To be clear, this isn’t a vote, but we will take all community feedback into account and answer whatever questions we can before finalizing anything.

Please keep in mind that we are not Reddit, we do not have Reddit’s resources, and safety and consent are our priorities.

I’ll post the draft in two parts in two comments: The new sidebar, and the FAQ/clarifications page.

  • usernotfound@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On a semi-related note, I created a tool to check which instances have defederated a certain Lemmy server. It works by getting the servers linked instance list, and for each of those check linked instance list, to see if the first server is blocked. It takes (quite) a few minutes to run, and it only ever hits each server once or twice, so it’s pretty chill resource-wise.

    As a side-effect, you can also use it to check which of the linked servers are offline in any way, so you could defederate those yourself to limit the amount of needless retries.

    As I said, It can take a while to run, so I’ll report back once the script is done :)

    • usernotfound@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, that took a little longer than expected. Here’s the confirmed list of Lemmy services that have defederated from LemmyNSFW:

      partizle.com
      aussie.zone
      lemmy.ml
      feddit.de
      lemmy.intai.tech
      lemmy.douwes.co.uk
      lemmy.serverfail.party
      talk.kururin.tech
      dormi.zone
      lemmy.tillicumnet.com
      feddit.dnico.io
      lemmy.procrastinati.org
      crystals.rest
      mlem.lea.moe
      lemmygrad.ml
      lemmy.design
      pcglinks.com
      discuss.divergentparenting.space
      dmv.social
      distress.digital
      i.d0ntknow.me
      lemmy.hqueue.dev
      borg.chat
      forkk.me
      lemthony.com
      lemmy.bleh.au
      on.syrma.cc
      lemmy.ecliptik.com
      ducks.dev
      udclemmy.xyz
      lemmy.starmade.de
      lemmy.calebmharper.com
      lemmy.dangilbert.eu
      lemmonade.marbledfennec.net
      bigfoot.ninja
      techy.news
      lemiverse.xyz
      geddit.social
      lemmy.safe-internet.org
      sopuli.xyz
      lemmy.federate.cc
      chat.maiion.com
      poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      lemmy.borlax.com
      lemmyfly.org
      civilloquy.com
      leddit.social
      surlesworld.com
      lemmy.fromshado.ws
      lemmy.mb-server.com 
      
      • gavi@lemmynsfw.comM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We are aware of this list and it should be noted that most (or nearly all) of these are due to either legal concerns for hosting links to pornography in their host country or due to “no porn” rules. :)

        • appropriateinside@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which seems fine, why would lemmynsfw try and federate with lots of other non-nsfw instances anyways? People are driven to making nsfw alts, and porn is one of those content types that enjoy long term organic growth without any advertising as users explicitly seek it out.

          • gavi@lemmynsfw.comM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            A large portion of instances do see a place for properly managed NSFW content in the federation.

    • homosampsin@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Much appreciated. There should really be an API function to return who blocked you right out of the gate rather than having to ask around instances you’re linked to, but I’m guessing it’s not possible because it’s an ActivityPub limitation. Not familiar at all with how the protocol works, though.