Well known KDE developer Nate Graham is out with a blog post today outlining his latest Wayland thoughts, how X11 is a bad platform, and the recent topic of “Wayland breaking everything” isn’t really accurate.

“In this context, “breaking everything” is another perhaps less accurate way of saying “not everything is fully ported yet”. This porting is necessary because Wayland is designed to target a future that doesn’t include 100% drop-in compatibility with everything we did in the past, because it turns out that a lot of those things don’t make sense anymore. For the ones that do, a compatibility layer (XWayland) is already provided, and anything needing deeper system integration generally has a path forward (Portals and Wayland protocols and PipeWire) or is being actively worked on. It’s all happening!”

Nate’s Original Blog Post

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
    15·
    11 months ago

    I don’t see why we need convincing that Wayland’s better. Most Linux users either use it currently or are possibly looking to switch in the future. The other people who are not are likely going to use X for eternity

    • Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social
      14·
      11 months ago

      I think real X11 fanboys are almost non-existent. Wayland wouldn’t be so rejected if it wasn’t that it still has a lot of compatibility issues, I think most people just want everything to work and don’t care whose fault it is.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
        12·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I don’t get why some people would think sticking to X is fanboyism. Nobody likes X, let alone love it. Most people’s relation to X is pragmatic, it’s “it works and does everything I need”.

        If anything, fanboyism is telling people they have to use Wayland when it doesn’t yet work for what they need it to do.

        Just keep improving the damn thing and people will switch when it’s ready. There’s no convincing needed.

        • Mnglw@beehaw.org
          2·
          11 months ago

          exactly this, I’ll use it when it works with no questions asked. I.e: when it becomes invisible to me as an enduser

          as for now, it isn’t, far from it

      • UnityDevice@startrek.website
        4·
        11 months ago

        I remember some 10-15 years ago when I’d look at the y windows website every couple of months hoping for some news of progress, simply because I was sick of x11 being so crappy. I hated it, it was so fiddly, it didn’t work right, I just wanted something that worked.
        So you can imagine how happy I was when Wayland started taking off. Here was the promise of something better, something that just worked, it sounded amazing. And yet, today I’m still running xorg and I will be for the foreseeable future.

        The reason is simply that in the time passed xorg just became usable, I don’t have to think about it, it works reliability, it has all the features I need and I hardly ever have to touch it. Meanwhile, I log into my Wayland session and instantly 3 or 4 of the applications I use daily either don’t work or act weird. I go and try and fix the issues and I’m told to just accept it, or that I actually don’t exist because Wayland works perfectly for everyone. And I’m not even using an Nvidia card, just plain Radeon.

        So I quit and go back to what works. Maybe in a couple of years, until then: no thanks.