• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      In fact, it’s pretty hard to think of a war since WW2 where US was on the right side of history.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Engaging with reality has nothing to do with hating Ukrainians. In fact, the only people who actually hate Ukrainians are the ones who want this war to keep going so that more people die or have their lives ruined. Anybody who looks at what happened over the past two years objectively can see that this has been an utter disaster for Ukraine, and it’s only getting worse.

        • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          You know that people can see your post history right?

          You’ve done nothing but post doom and gloom for Ukraine and some fairly pro Russian stuff.

          The war ends when Russia fucks off from my country. It’s that simple. Russia is just pissed that we’ve told them multiple times to fuck off. (Euromaidan, electing Zelensky, etc).

          As far as the article goes nothing surprising really. America is a huge arms dealer who has a massive arsenal at their disposal. This is par the course really. On one side I’m not super pleased that America will be heavily embedded in Ukraine now. On the flip side I’m glad my people are being helped.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            What I post is a realistic analysis of the situation, and having delusional fantasies about the state of the war certainly isn’t helping anybody. Also, last I checked Zelensky was elected on the platform of implementing Minsk and patching up relations with Russia. The fact that you would lie about something like this says volumes.

            The reality is that America has hollowed out its industrial power and at this point can’t produce weapons at the rate they’re being consumed in this war. Furthermore, Ukraine isn’t central to US interests because US is ultimately preparing for a war with China. What’s going to happen in the end is that US will abandon Ukraine. Anybody who thinks that US will fight for Ukraine at the expense of US interests is historically illiterate.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Donbas has always been the main issue between Ukraine and Russia, and if Zelensky actually followed through on his platform Russia would’ve likely not cared about Ukraine joining the EU. In fact, they even said as much. Instead, Zelensky did a 180 on what he said he’d do and now we are here.

                • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  My dude. I’m from Toretsk. I’ll give you a second to google where that is.

                  We voted for him because we wanted the change he was promising. Which was to distance ourselves from the corruptive influence of Russia and move closer to the EU. It’s not like my poeple haven’t even trying to do this for years now.

            • at_an_angle
              link
              English
              51 year ago

              I’m sorry. What? Hollowed out our industrial power? Lmfao.

              The US is ramping up production to meet the needs of Ukraine. Granted, it took a bit to get that rolling, but when we decide to make weapons, boy do we make weapons.

              Throw as many articles as you want about how Ukraine is using more ammunition that we are currently producing. They mean nothing.

              We’re giving them our older model stuff from the 90s. Compare that to the mothballed museum pieces Russia is rolling out.

              And I’m not going to respond further because after reading what you posted and preemptively defending this post, you are a troll, a vatnik, a Russian propaganda mouthpiece or all three.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                US industry accounts for only around 11% of its GDP nowadays, and the amount of shells US can produce today is laughable.

                Army Secretary Christine Wormuth separately told reporters that the U.S. will go from making 14,000 155mm shells each month to 20,000 by the spring and 40,000 by 2025.

                Biden has literally admitted that the reason cluster munitions are being sent is because US ran through the regular munition stocks.

                You’re not going to respond further because you know that the facts aren’t on your side. No amount of name calling and personal insults is going to change that. You’re either an ignoramus or a liar, either way not a good look.

                • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  Draining stocks is exactly what the US wants. Are you really this daft and don’t understand this simple point. This is huge money making expedition for the US.

                • at_an_angle
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I’m only responding because I actually read the article you linked. Lmfao.

                  Did you just Google us production and paste the first link that came up without reading it?

                  From the link YOU provided:

                  The push comes as the U.S. has supplied Ukraine with more than 1 million artillery rounds, and as Pentagon officials see the war in Ukraine continuing indefinitely, further draining stocks for the U.S. and allies. Bush said it’s unclear what the Ukrainian military’s mid- and long-term needs will be, and the U.S. Army wants to be ready.

                  “We are in a position to support Ukraine, but it’s more the mid and long term,” Bush said. “By creating this capacity … if this war goes three or four years, we’ll be in a position to just vastly outproduce the Russians all by ourselves ― and if you combine that with our allies, then we’re just dwarfing their capability. They won’t be able to keep up.”

                  That comes from December 2022.

                  FROM THE SAME SOURCE: Pentagon budget aims to max munitions production, make multiyear buys just a few months ago.

                  That goes over a whole plan to ramp up production over MANY different weapons and munitions.

                  Oh, and that 11% manufacturing thing you threw out in another comment?

                  Bro. USA GDP in 2022 was like $20 Billion. Yes, with a B. Look up the top ten economies of that year. Still with only 11% manufacturing that’s $2.2Billion.

                  Russia came in 11th at 2Billion. Our tiny 11% manufacturing would come in at 8th place on the world stage.

                  Cope harder.

              • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                They really don’t understand a simple concept. Unused munitions are a “bad” thing for an arms manufacturer. This is all a huge boon for the US at the cost of non US lives.

                • at_an_angle
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Yup. Have all of our “older” stuff, we have a lot and will make new ones.

                  Oh, and be careful in this thread. Fighting vatniks high as hell on copium is dangerous. Best to let them be and ignore them.

                  All they have is the same few weak and dumb arguments. It’ll give you a headache of you try to logically argue with someone who just throws shit.

              • 133arc585
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                We’re giving them our older model stuff from the 90s. Compare that to the mothballed museum pieces Russia is rolling out.

                Think about this for a moment. The USA is using its older stuff first.

                You look at what Russia is using and you think it’s old or not as advanced. Why aren’t you making the logical conclusion (which is backed by evidence if you look) that Russia is doing the exact same thing as the USA?

                Why is the USA’s use of old weaponry simply that–use of old weaponry–but Russia’s use of old weaponry is…something else? Corruption? Incompetence? Whatever other excuse you want to come up with?

                It’s safe to assume that Russia knows that the USA and other countries are going to send older reserves of weapons first. So it’s not unreasonable for Russia to not use more than is necessary and bring in their newest and best weaponry.