The beatings will continue until morale improves.
*until the economy improves
Fake confidence for fake economic data, the Chinese way
“US does the same” posts article of a news site covering the topic that was “cracked down on”. I don’t think you know what cracked down on means in the PRC.
Ok, but you know that’s not at all the same, right?
Well, but you see, clickbait makes money. Think of the shareholders, won’t you?
/s if not obvious
Something about beatings and morale?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
China is cracking down on negative commentary about the financial market and other sectors as the authorities seek to boost public confidence despite challenging economic headwinds.
Topics that are considered increasingly sensitive in China’s economy include record high youth unemployment figures (the government stopped publishing this data in August), deflation, the struggling property sector and capital flight.
In June, three finance commentators, one of whom had 4.7 million Weibo followers, were blocked by the platform as a punishment for “hyping up the unemployment rate, spreading negative information … [and] smearing the development of the securities market”.
Dan Wang, the chief economist at Hang Seng Bank, said “the number one sensitive issue now” was foreign investment, because of its links to cross-border capital flows.
Evergrande, once China’s biggest developer, is in the midst of a painful debt restructuring process, while Country Garden, its main rival, defaulted in October.
There is also pressure on economists in Hong Kong to be optimistic about the mainland economy, although analysts say this is a long-term trend and one that comes from a general atmosphere of deference to Beijing rather than specific instructions.
The original article contains 725 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Surely this won’t end up with an emperor has no clothes moment for China. No authoritarian state has ever kicked the truth can down the road so far it ended up in disaster, right?
