Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM to Memes@midwest.socialEnglish · 2 years ago

I HATE that this is real and not doctored

midwest.social

message-square
80
fedilink
607

I HATE that this is real and not doctored

midwest.social

seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialM to Memes@midwest.socialEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
80
fedilink
  • lugal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    A nuke destroys whole ecosystems…

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Plenty of things will survive it, and the removal of the humans in the area may be a net positive.

    • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Chernobyl is doing pretty well now that it’s completely uninhabitable by humans…

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      So do we… at least the nuke stops killing new things after a bit.

      • occhionaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Define “a bit”, please

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Few months/years. The radioactive isotopes created in the explosion have a short half life. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today.

          • lugal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today.

            That contradicts the whole point that a nuke will destroy humans but leave the environment intact. A bomb of any kind destroys ecosystems. If humans reclaim the cities, it’s not a “net positive” for the environment, despite the cynicism that’s in the statement.

            “Land back” is a much better approach since land under indigenous jurisdiction has much more biodiversity than average and especially than bombed land.

        • fox2263@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Perhaps 1 minute?

    • Flimbo@lemmy.worldB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Humans do that too https://youtu.be/bmVGwOP_zi8?si=lobEy6mBiIRCVmoL

Memes@midwest.social

memes@midwest.social

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@midwest.social
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 47 users / day
  • 140 users / week
  • 147 users / month
  • 4.71K users / 6 months
  • 9 local subscribers
  • 1.52K subscribers
  • 448 Posts
  • 5.34K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.social
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org