• java@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand this fetish. Every day I read about problems people have with Wayland, while I’ve been using X for the past 15 years without any issues.

    • Loucypher@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wayland is better at segmenting each app. On X any app could potentially see/record what happen on the entire screen while on Wayland that requires you do manually grant the rights. Similar to how macOS is requesting you to give each app the possibility to record your screen or not.

      • java@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s an improvement. But risk = impact * probability. Realistically, the probability of installing such an app from repos is virtually non-existent. My point is that Wayland comes with some improvements, but I’ve been seeing comments like the one I replied to for almost 15 years, as if Wayland will revolutionize Linux desktop. It won’t. Probably most users won’t see any difference, except for bugs caused by the migration.

        • jw13@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The probability of abuse is much higher with closed-source applications though. Almost all popular games are closed-source, and many are riddled with ads and spyware.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have been using X since 1992 with lots of issues. I do not understand the fetish with X11 and why people cling to it so tightly.

      • java@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that was true, we would be on Wayland for years. But in reality, it proves minor improvements versus heavy investments to migrate from X. And that’s why it’s still a fetish and not a standard.