• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never said that 9/11 was a successful use of terrorism

    I have quoted you several times saying exactly that.

    I said that the statement Data made about the troubles being successful was offensive and would be similar to saying the same thing about other terrorist attacks.

    you may have intended to argue that, but you clearly argued:

    It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism

    and now you keep insisting that:

    You then aggressively began demanding evidence for something that was never a statement of fact, making it unclear what you were talking about.

    when you very clearly said this:

    It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism

    and now are acting indignant that I have to keep reminding you of that and how you’re somehow unclear of why after I’ve explained it several times.

    I’’m very sorry you can’t wrap your head around this. and, yes, it’s best you don’t respond again, as I’d just keep repeating myself.

    • VioletTeacup@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism.” Sorry, I don’t know how this could have been clearer. Take care!

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        if that’s what you meant, perhaps you should have said that at some point…

        I don’t know how this could have been clearer

        by saying what you mean and actually providing evidence to back up your claims, as I have said repeatedly.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            except for the first time you said it in your last comment, show me where you said “9/11 was a terrorist attack" before. because what you were arguing before was:

            It’s sort of like saying 9/11 was an effective use of terrorism

            do you have amnesia?

              • gregorum@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                ok, so, you do have amnesia and have forgotten our entire conversation. well, then I suggest you go back to the beginning because I’m not walking you through this again.