EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoTwitter users right nowsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square360fedilinkarrow-up12.94Kcross-posted to: beyondcombustion@lemmy.beyondcombustion.net
arrow-up12.94KimageTwitter users right nowsh.itjust.worksEmoDuck@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square360fedilinkcross-posted to: beyondcombustion@lemmy.beyondcombustion.net
minus-squareGeoGio7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-21 year agoHasn’t it already been established that threads would most likely deathhug most of the fediverse? It’s content would be overwhelming and nothing could keep up with it. I’d rather have the fediverse be a more small scale, cozy and niche place*.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoIn that case you can always use an instance that defederated threads
Hasn’t it already been established that threads would most likely deathhug most of the fediverse? It’s content would be overwhelming and nothing could keep up with it. I’d rather have the fediverse be a more small scale, cozy and niche place*.
In that case you can always use an instance that defederated threads