• thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think that’s the difference: Pirate Bay and Silkroad knew they were inherently anti-establishment, but it seems to me that Parler and Gab think of themselves as “alternative establishment” or something.

    Pirate Bay was never trying to compete with Netflix or Steam-- it’s conceptually very different. But Parler very much wants (wanted?) to just be Twitter but with right-wing politics.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      10 months ago

      Parler and gab just want to be mask-off racist twitter/facebook. Nothing anti-establishment there at all.

      Pirate Bay and Silk Road were knowingly breaking the law in nearly every nation on earth and trying to avoid capture doing so, both failed to do so by various degrees. This is anti-establishment as they are flagrantly disobeying copyright and narcotics laws at these two sites.

      Pirate Bay is still operational, just not by the original owner. I don’t know about Silk Road as I have no interest in drugs

    • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s a great distinction, I’m gonna start stealing that.

      Some people aren’t anti establishment, they are anti-not-my-establishment. You can’t call yourself anti establishment if you just don’t like the current one.

      • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Totally. I’m not even sure how many do call themselves anti-establishment, but I do know that there’s lots of talk on the right about building a “second economy” and “alternative public square” and stuff like the Daily Wire trying to make movies, all as part of this “fine, I’ll open my own casino” kind of play. It’s very purposefully establisment-focused, just not the existing one.