I would take this with a grain of salt, there is a large chance we are just monitoring our outbreaks and tracking/cataloging them better. My friends in epidemiology and outbreak tracking have mentioned the US isnt playing ball right now and it is likely they may not be publishing outbreak numbers like we do anymore
Show your cards more wow
I knew youd do it eventually
People still spread false rhetoric about this murder unfortunately, can attest to that in Alberta at least. When it comes up I have to defuse that minefield on the regular and I still hear a lot of pushback
We have a long way to go still and the RCMP arent about to beat any allegations even now
The real answer right here, I dont think ive seen a proper gaming Cafe in like a decade. Id love to see them still exist but in my neck of the woods most people save for their own gaming PC or just get a console
I think if hardware prices stay where theyre at though maybe a feasible return could be seen but we dont even have the LAN party spirit around anymore to draw groups for multiplayer like we did back in the day
Nobody has to be tolerant of intolerance
That’s the core principle of the paradox of tolerance
You are arguing that we should be tolerant of intolerance
But alas i am only a featherless biped my beach running is ungainly and lacks a tail
What “two sets of rights” are you addressing then? What “both sides” is there to gender acceptance?
Rhetorical question by the way. There are no valid “sides” to bigotry.
The only fake argument here is pretending that GSRM people existing and being accepted has valid opposition and acting like this is some “left vs right” issue and not a bare minimum human rights argument that has no valid opposition that isnt rooted at its core in ignorance and/or bigotry
Some arguments dont get to be a BoTh SiDeS game
I would genuinely ask you what actual valid argument you believe exists in opposition to GSRM acceptance but I dont believe in platforming fallacious or bigoted opinions as somehow equivalent to fact and the FACTS are: LGBTQ+/GSRM people exist, have always existed, did not choose to be who they are, and have a right to exist same as anyone else regardless of prejudice
And your comment is trying to “both sides” gender acceptance that is what this entire post is about
You really need to edit in a sarcasm tag, be careful what you joke about.
When you say “someones rights to conflict” you’re saying someone has a right to not support gender diversity in this context
Im not engaging with that and you dont have a “right” to not like gender diversity
There is no “both sides” to accepting LGBTQ+ people
No, im criticizing their argument. You dont get to say trans acceptance is a “both sides” issue full stop.
This is a minefield of a comment that is way above my pay grade…
You dont have a “right” to deny a group of people public existence. That isnt how any of that works.
Is this worth it still? I saw the reviews were pretty mixed and had removed it off my wishlist because it looked like it needed balancing and never got it
I heard molasses/full sugar cola is really good for gas tanks on heavy equipment i wonder if that’s still true
Completely besides the point and only theoretically speaking of course
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
There arent “two sides” to accepting the existence of a group of people
There is acceptance and there isnt. You dont get to say people who dont believe that trans people exist have some kind of valid argument.
You wouldnt say this shit about the civil rights movement
This is a human rights issue. Trans rights are human rights. If you dont think that you shouldn’t be participating in a discussion about trans inclusion.
“Transgenderism” huh…