He absolutely does. No idea if it’s supposed to be a bit.

Good find, this is never-take-me-seriously stupid, and also does the beigeness thing of trying to gradually work around an accepted definition in order to almost make a point at the last minute, here being that since (we have apparently concluded that) (because of uh hypothetical brain surgery and stuff) accountability = improvability + punishability and nothing else so of course software can be held “accountable” in all the ways that matter.

His big mistake is not doing it at novel length so it’s really obvious that he’s being willfully stupid about it.

Is that the guy who’s always trying to use LessWrong as preemptive conversion therapy to cure him of having trans thoughts, and they’re actually having none of it?

I mean it’s so cut and dried you had to invent a disadvantage for pushing the red button.

Maybe the catch is that picking red means you are basically ok with offing people who don’t think like you do en masse, even though it’s posited like a dilemma between securing the lives of your family vs giving a chance to hypothetical people who are heavily OCD in favor of blue buttons.

If this isn’t pure engagement bait, what’s the real world situation this is supposed to map to? Pressing red means you always live, and if everyone pushes red everyone lives so…

I mean if blue is supposed to be a proxy for altruism, that usually doesn’t come with a certain death conditional.

Apparently, you buy some currency type thing called AI Units and this is the rate the different LLMs consume them. The multipliers used to represent requests I think, i.e. times you triggered inference, but ai units are a proxy for token burn in a somewhat vague way, which makes me think there will be rate limit related controversies similar to what’s now happening with anthropic.

Existing enterprise users will get double the AIUs for three months to ease them to the new pricing model, so autumn (when the enterprise AIU pools get effectively halved) is gonna be fun.

New copilot pricing just dropped, takes effect after June 1:

Some highlights for copilot pro and pro+:

ZSNES makes a comeback, has No Vibe Coding stipulation front and center.

I use AI sparingly to make sure the company-paid subscription is a net loss for the AI vendor.

Hey, it could happen.

Overall, I think it was a bit cookie cutter for an article of this type, but maybe It’s just the preaching to the choir effect. Even the fact that he ostensibly quit his job over this stuff doesn’t hit as hard as it should, it comes off as if he could have done so at any time but this way he gets to grandstand about it.

Also stuff like this:

It wasn’t a bad job, not by most metrics. It ticked the boxes a job is supposed to tick: good pay. Health insurance. Remote work. Time off. Nice coworkers.

sounds like it should be in a how do you do, fellow workers copypasta.

The poster goes on to whine about how it sucks it’s not the same as solving puzzles and they’re just QAing all day now and calls the LLM a slot machine, so at least they’re not boosting.

Still, they don’t go so far as to say they were forced to work this way, so their not even looking at the code either means they’re a lazy bum or that it’s too far past incoherent to be worth it.

Saw a remarkable take on the pro-AI parts of bsky, that since DeepSeek420.69 can offer the model at like 15% of Claude’s pricing, that must mean that Anthropic is operating at an at least 80% positive margin on inference, so things will work out.

In the same thread they complained about Zitron’s math being dodgy.

Nadella told colleagues he has started testing Clawdbot

Nadella? Satya I run ten agents to read the news and my mails and explain them to me before sending answers in my place Nadella? Weird he’s still around, thought he’d be a bot by now.

Clawpilot sounds completely cursed, can’t wait.

Their heart seems to be in the right place, police interrogation will be exploitative and brainwashy with no real consequences for the interrogators, but they sure chose the dumbest possible way to make their point:

Despite the claims of AI evangelists, chatbots aren’t people and haven’t achieved sentience. The differences between a chatbot and a real person, however, make Heaton’s ability to elicit a false confession more disturbing, not less.

“ChatGPT lacks many of the vulnerabilities that make people more likely to falsely confess — like stress, fatigue, and sleep deprivation,” said Saul Kassin, a professor emeritus at John Jay College who wrote the book on false confessions. “If ChatGPT can be induced into a false confession, then who isn’t vulnerable?”

In the same period, the English-language alignment and AI ethics literature produced no substantive engagement. No citations. No rebuttal.

Wow it’s almost like alignment and AI ethics studies is less a serious academic field and more like a prank capital likes to play on consumers.

But I also think Zhao Tingyang’s take that alignment will make AI evil because people are evil falls too much into the the-people-deserve-to-be-disempowered totalitarian state funny business side of things to be especially influential down these parts.

I assume that’s more because they used AI to lift zootopia’s art style wholesale and so that’s just how rabbits are now.

It’s not so much he fails the purity test than it is he thinks all gen-ai works like whisper on a laptop and open source LLMs grow on trees.

edit: and also that big company engineers are encouraged to be discreet in using them, like what?

CEV is what he would want if he were wiser and less confused

Isn’t that just steelmanning?

I gathered the “idealized version of myself” was because it’s supposed to be applied to a superintelligence, because of course it’s an alignment thing.

I checked it out because I was curious if CEV was some international relations initialism I’d never heard of, turns out its just My Guess About What He Wants in rationalese.

Richard Lynn was right

Ah yes, the everyone in the continent of Africa and parts of Asia is secretly heavily developmentally disabled, my friend Cremieux who’s definitely a highly accredited biologistician and not a college drop out who’s also a nazi thinks this as well post.

Re the incel stuff I think the regulars grew older so it doesn’t come up as much outside the comments, which remain a safe space for this type of whining.

It’s not really extricable from the eugenics iinspired bioessentialism that’s encouraged there I think.

The MCP thing feels like an I like to leave my keys as a huge bulge under the welcome mat type vulnerability. It seems really easy to not do that and also something that is kind of out of scope for both lock makers and mat salesmen to address directly.

Maybe the MCP ecosystem is such that it’s hard to both avoid this and keep the impression that you’re doing magic and not just implementing a heavily annotated API, hopefully secured and with specific and well-defined functionality, and also they are all hacks.