i think the difference between the two happens to be an article v convention.

what was the question you asked again?

i am being very serious.

i actually have autism. seriously.

any pronouns are good, and i prefer gender-neutral and feminine terms.

it’s slippin time.

better call saul.

i think the people should’ve fought back against george w. bush when he won in 2000.

again, i’m still being very serious. is it okay i can send my political quiz results?

by “ansyn”, do you mean anarcho-syndicalism?

also, i live in the us. if the cia decides to have a coup against the us, the people would fight back. then the cia would get reformed when the people wins.

primary these establishment democrats. vote progressives.

any pronouns are good.

in that case, i mostly support materialism. i’m NOT sure if it’s okay for anyone to pressure the ruling class into fitting in in a socialist country. that said, the government should be that of the people by the people for the people, as lincoln said in his gettysburg address, rather than the government of the rich and wealthy snobs who stifle people’s liberties. that’s one of the reasons why i support left-libertarianism.

“…government of the people by the people for the people shall not perish from the earth.” - abe lincoln, 1863

so you want china to annex as much of the us as they can?

i’m pretty sure i’d go with the latter.

i support a synthesis of leftist ideologies (such as/like left communism (de leonism and all), libertarian socialism, social democracy and market socialism) to a point where i can only describe my views as ‘left-libertarian’.

my ideology is broken down into four stages (before and after revolution)

before revolution:

1. first stage: capitalism - the rich snobs own the means of production.

after revolution:

2. second stage: the people collectively own the means of production through a planned market framework - companies and corporations become split and collectivized, some become state-owned - the government runs as a dictatorship of the proletariat through councils with dual power between the parties and the unions, rather than a party-state framework.

3. third stage: markets become abolished in favor of a participatory economy, money replaced with labor vouchers.

4. fourth stage: full communism - a classless, moneyless and stateless society.

to answer your question: i support individual freedoms because i support the freedoms of speech, of religion, of the press, to assemble peacefully and to redress grievances (or simply ‘complain about potholes to the governments’). i support collectivism because i think if one CAN’T do something alone, then the community should help them out.

also, i think idealism and materialism can go hand-in-hand - for example, i support ideals such as/like freedom and equity, and i think that the conditions we are in right now may spark a socialist society where these ideals are the words on the street, and would therefore change these conditions. i think this is the best way i can answer your concerns.

oh, and henry kissinger enabled war crimes.

1. i find ‘food not bombs’ to be very interesting. i also support blm because i strongly support equity.
2. i was in my bedroom, chilling.

i’m actually non-binary, and i prefer gender-neutral and feminine terms. that said, there’s also ideosorter (https://ideosorter.github.io/ and https://quark88.github.io/ideosorter).

i am being serious. do you want me to show my political quiz results?

so do you think that the us constitution should be changed completely?