While you can setup a second profile to put the Google services into, I don’t recommend it.

The version of Google Services on GrapheneOS thinks it has root, but it does not.

So there’s no dramatic need to setup a second profile, unless you want it for other reasons.

I personally think the second profile feature is one of the things people think they want/need from GrapheneOS, but really are happier without.

(Sure it’s safer, but GrapheneOS is already so much better than other mobile OSes - and I hate to see someone quit GrapheneOS just because they didn’t like the optional profiles.)

An exception I have seen is for apps mandated for a job. I’m happy to bury that stuff deep.

In addition to what else was shared: GrapheneOS now has fairly nuanced options for running apps.

Things that previously would not run at all, now often run fine - if granted additional permissions, such as the permission for the developer to be lousy at their job (various settings under “Exploit Protection”).

Many apps run afowl of “Exploit Protections”, but if you trust the app author, those settings can be disabled just for that app. Just realize that needing these settings generally means the app developer is bad at their job. If that’s for an Indie Game - oh well. But when t’s my bank…maybe I should reconsider who I trust with my money.)

This allows deciding how much to trust each app author.

I find it creepy that Google hasn’t back-ported more of these privacy features into stock Android.

Specifically regarding the two app types you mention:

Regarding authenticators: I have yet to encounter one that fails on GrapheneOS. I have found some that only allow backups via Google services, which feels insane to me, anyway.

I wish someone had pointed me to Aegis sooner. Aegis is compatible with every MFA service I have tried it with, fully open source, available on F-Droid, and supports backing up to an encrypted file.

Regarding finance management apps: These have gotten super invasive, recently. Mine all work fine on GrapheneOS, but don’t play nice with routine VPN usage, or with ever having location services disabled even for a minute.

The saving grace is that all the finance apps I use have had perfectly functional websites, which cannot be made invasive, the way an app can.

nobody just breaks out in song when they get dumped, for example.

You’re one of today’s lucky 10,000!

That amused me, too.

I think it plays fine for the intended audience, though.

For the folks looking into Anubis, that line plays well - because hosting costs are driven up by the kinds of spam bot visits that Anubis slows down.

The rule of cool helps with honesty too.

My team knew well in advance that we would be short-staffed on the day the Switch 2 released.

I like the sound of “EmptyPromisesAboutTheWrongTopicsSocial” or maybe “StatusQuoKeepersSocial”.

But when a mid-tier or entry level dev can do 60% of what a senior can do, it’ll be a great way to cut costs.

Same as how an entry level architect can build a building 60% as tall, and that’ll last 60% as long, right?

Edit: And an entry level aerospace engineer with AI assistance will build a plane that’s 60% as good at not crashing.

I’m not looking forward to the world I believe is coming…

I have good news!?

…This isn’t a particularly gendered problem.

Well shoot. We were aiming to create an impression of a big group of us - like if there were 40 or more of us.

That looks promising. I wonder if it will be friends with me?

I’m a problems-oriented consultant. Whatever your problem is, I can help you split it into two barely smaller problems.

Sure, like NFTs were here to stay, and the gazillion different shitcoins that were popping up everywhere some years ago.

I bet you’re just angry that you didn’t hold onto your ape NFTs. They’re going to skyrocket back soon. (I hope my sarcasm here is obvious, of course.)

The Who is this for? is amazing.

The little squiggles are necessary to ensure election outcomes acceptable to the ultra rich.

I’m joking. (Mostly)

The squiggles are probably county line divisions, and probably simply the smallest existing land divisions with good population data available to make the map from.

I say “mostly joking” because existing county line divisions are already weird in some cases, to ensure election outcomes acceptable to the ultra rich. So there’s an unpleasant grain of truth in my joke.

the very fact that there is a big urban/rural cultural divide is one of the things killing America.

I agree wholeheartedly about the problem. But blind highest count vote on every topic is one of the big dividers between rural and urban folks.

Rural folks will simply never have the numbers to influence outcomes in a pure vote count scenario. They’re aware of this, and it leads to animosity.

Incidentally, I agree that financial decoupling would be ruinous for both, as well.

The real solution is represtational seats that give everyone a voice - no matter how the voting zone is divided.

I suspect that requires doing away with first-past-the-poll. The winner of that race will almost always be a city person, by raw numeric chance. That’s fine, city folks have some good ideas. The problem is when there’s no rural voice at the negotiation, at all.

And I think any sensible person realizes we also have to put a stop to all gerrymandering.

Also, we need to give seats to what remains of all of the first nations, while we’re at it.

The key lesson here is that anyone can find $25 / month to waste on WebVan stock.

This still has the representative issue that each of the narrow bands are narrow due to a huge metropolis within them, and the rural population of that band will always live with rules created by the metropolis for the metropolis.

It’s a pretty map, though.

And is still makes more sense than “carefully negotiated by powerful ultra rich a few hundred years ago to protect each of their giant egos.”

It’s worth noting that we also lose on the output, contractors tend to underperform compared to long term stable employees.

So there’s a case to be made that it is even lose/lose/lose (more expensive/worse outcomes/loss of economic stimulus of good stable jobs).

One of the first messages translated:

“Are the monkeys listening? Shit. How long have they been listening? I should provide some context for what I bubbled yesterday…”