not their government, no

In order to find out the intricacies of WHY, yes.

yipes, my gpu cant manage max settings anymore, time to sell my other spleen I guess.

you mean kinda like how you have to upload a photo of your face to do the same in Britain?

we use language in different contexts. In the food store “fruit” has one meaning, while in a botany paper, it has another.

This doesn’t say theres no such thing as fish generally, it says there is no useful definition for it in a biological setting.

2000s: Actually, fish aren’t fish

https://www.sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-fish-say-cladists

still is

/i3gang

skill issue

fun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1631

and mormonism

Fun fact, their website is still up https://www.heavensgate.com/

tell me one food that isn’t made of chemicals

Sorry for being a dick but it

Just stop then.

Between people on the internets lack of good grammar and common courtesy, the first one is a far smaller problem in my eyes.

I believe you got that backwards

Cans and glass are infinitely recyclable. Recycling aluminum saves 96% of the energy of producing new.

oh wow thats much better than I thought!

Sadly, recycling isn’t as effective as one might think. For example, only a small subset of the plastic you put in the plastic recycling bin will actually be recycled.

Does this mean you shouldn’t bother? No, but it gives all the more reason to try to use less plastic to begin with.

deleted by creator

“uh, grass.”

come on now, let them cook, trust the process