This is just plain false.

There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones.

the largest ones we’ve managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html

Yeah its about quantum systems interacting, not sentient beings watching.

still pretty mystical though in my book!

does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?

deleted by creator

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

your point is valid, but why be so abrasive about it?

Tbf this is my only actual source https://youtu.be/4l2RDCx2YnA

but he makes it sound like it’s quite a bit worse than that

I dunno, all you need to see that something is going on is 100m or so of elevation with an overview of a medium sized lake

keeping US citizenship abroad is very expensive I hear. They want your taxes

oh, I hadn’t the slightest

minority report in 3… 2…

five? thats a few minutes per day

“bleeding dry” lol

oh! it worked for me once, but not the second time, my bad

Ironic how they want me to download an app from the google store in order to let me read the article.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260219155346/https://www.ftm.eu/articles/follow-the-money-is-phasing-out-us-tech

deleted by creator

matter changes state based on temperature

This is a gross oversimplification and your experiment proves that :)

ermahgerd, berbs!

that means (if your locale is set according to your position), you are probably somewhere in the blue area on this, while I’m in the orange.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:First_Day_of_Week_World_Map.svg

right! like, why complicate things?