Yeah, you don’t need to be a celebrity with kids to empathize with that one

that’ll teach him to take it easy next time!

… do I need to add the /s ? ;)

This number goes for any substance

There are 20 billion calories in a gram of diet coke too

This is the solution to E=mc^2

If we are talking dietary calories uranium is close to 0

On the contrary. This plays with the expectation of that being the punchline, but subverts that expectation.

This is not accurate, only 93% has died so far!

hurr durr maybe it’s a vector in ℝ

What they actually see:

convolution
cross product
dot product
multiplication

“You’re doing it wrong ya doofus”

propaganda based view that Ukraine/“the west” didn’t start the war

🤦

I dont know about you, but taking “illegally” siezed Russian assets and using them to fund Ukraines defence against the illegal Russian invasion makes sense to me.

thanks!

The article fails to explain what in the law they are lobbying against.

happened to my laptop q couple of years ago and my stationary just this summer :|

ah, that makes sense!

yeah same here, just a hickup it seems.

“New Pixel update means your RCS messages might be visible to your boss”

US law is an interesting response to an ethics question

The problem with only counting calories for health has never been more aptly highlighted!

as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.

That number is just the E in E=mc²

If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.

We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands.

That sounds great actually! Lets see how they actually implement it though. After how they communicated this previously, I’m hesitant to get my hopes up.