Naa, allowing a single post to affect my opinion of a group would be silliness, no worries :). As for AI, I can understand peoples reticence, particularly in regards to corpos using it to replace humans. I just run local models as a means to explore ideas, fantasies, and have a bit of fun in my free time. Thanks for the response kind stranger, may your day be excellent :).

The real kicker is how you even decide what quality is. A one line script that updates a driver may be a solution to your issue. A four page walkthrough that rambles and gets you to your answer but only after an hour is still a solution, but is it better quality? The issue is that you can’t quantify quality. Even if you managed to for something like programming, you couldn’t apply that same logic to horticulture. The issue is that quality isn’t something you can stick in an algorithm.

Having played the demo of this game it was phenomenal. It handles Risk/Reward in a fun way that allows you to push your runs for better rewards while generally leaving you with the option to leave a portion of a map undone for an easy exit. It was a genuinely fun experience, and from my brief interaction with one of the devs it’s clear that they care a lot about this project. I’m definitely planning to grab it when it releases!