Major_Tsiom

If the strategy of the party under investigation is to hide evidence, shouldn’t they just be assumed to be guilty? The burden of proof is on the accuser, but if the accused hides or destroys evidence, I think that should forfeit their assumed innocence. If withholding and or destruction of evidence can be proved, then the accused party should be assumed to be guilty.

Just one nation can derail everything? How can that be? It’s so fucking easy to bribe just one!!! They need to fix that…

Yes, that is absolutely true, but the wealthy have shown to be very adept at controlling what the public perceives as “reality.” They control the narrative for the majority of the public through ownership and control of the mainstream media. I don’t think it is possible to get enough people to unify against them and overthrow them in the modern age of bullshit. I hope I am wrong, but damn… I’m not seeing it.

The problem is that billionaires have minions. Paid goons (mostly ex military or police) who will protect them. Of course, if we were to actually unify, the number advantage would be so overwhelming that it wouldn’t matter. The revolution or whatever you want to call it probably wouldn’t even take a week. But try to get an overwhelming number of people to agree on ANYTHING. Try it. Ain’t gonna happen.