PunishedWeezing [he/him]

By diluting its toxic gases with a special process, the highest grade of perfume can be extracted. To Weezing, gases emanating from garbage are the ultimate feast.

  • 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 8 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 23rd, 2025

help-circle
  • and? Does that make them immune to criticisms of revisionism and collaboration with imperialists? China is guilty of this as well. There is a liberal rot in both of their foreign policy apparatuses, and they need to purge them and stand in solidarity with each other - not bicker and run off to America when spurned. Both are far too chummy with the Israelis and Americans. There’s only so long the “we trade with everyone equally” excuse holds up to scrutiny before it collapses, and that was some time ago. Capital has strong footholds in both, and this is a serious problem that is warping their decision making to be more nationalistic and short-sighted.



  • There is a scoreboard, it’s zero sum. Vietnam will either support China or support America (or remain neutral, tacitly support America) in the upcoming cold or hot wars between the two. That is the scoreboard, and apparently for a lot of people in Vietnam and the leadership of the Vietnamese communist party it’s a pretty close thing, or Americans are even ahead. That it’s up in question at all is a problem for me and shows some pretty high level failures of leadership and education, and it’s pretty insulting to the millions who were killed by the Americans to just give into many of the conditions the Americans wanted and lose the peace, to allow American media and money to manipulate your economy and society and warp it into a pro-American outlook.

    I was wrong about China apologizing actually, they have downplayed it and tried to make diplomatic amends in general with Vietnam but they haven’t specifically made an apologetic statement on that war that I can find. I think China should do so, it would benefit them to admit they were wrong in that instance and try to pay reparations. They shouldn’t leave open gaps that the colonizers can wedge and exploit.

    Sorry for being smarmy. I don’t really mean it it’s just how I talk.




  • It is a zero-sum game between whether Vietnam supports China more, or America more. Those are the multipolar blocs of power. That’s why they are being compared. The question being implicitly asked underneath this discussion is “who would Vietnam side with in a war or cold war between China and America? Or would they remain neutral” or put another way, in a correct-thinking anti-imperialist manner: Would Vietnam fight against imperialists or with them, or would they try to fail their duties of internationalism and solidarity and remain neutral?

    There are legitimate concerns and hopes that Vietnam would participate as part of the ring of containment against China, alongside Japan, Occupied Korea, Occupied Chinese Taipei, India, etc. That they are brought up in this light isn’t damning? It’s the tug-of-war meme where you see who’s on your side and go wtf?


  • Bad news for you, that’s a wash because Americans and the CIA also backed the Khmer Rouge. This was a huge failure and mistake on China’s part, a crime even, one they have apologized for. It’s still nothing in comparison to the American invasion, and I’m tired of pretending they are equal things on two sides of a scale and they wash each other out. They don’t.

    Of more importance, the errors of the sino-soviet split are being repeated here between Vietnam and China. They both run to America when spurned, which is the exact problem. Their failure of solidarity and to stand together is the problem. They need to advance ideologically to the point where they stop doing this and stand together against imperialism.

    DPRK and Cuba fight in solidarity with other struggles against the capitalists and imperialists. They get it. Vietnam and China squabbling is an indication and warning that there’s something rotten in these state departments (liberalism) and they don’t get it. They need to become as deeply ideologically advanced as the DPRK :)

    Let’s not forget, the sino-soviet split happened because of ideological failures of both parties. It was first the Kruschevite revisionism and liberalization that angered Mao, and then Mao’s failure by cozying up with the American imperialists and squabbling with the USSR in geopolitical struggles, often backing really terrible people like the Mujahideen. One side made a failure of principles, and then the other, in response made an even bigger one. This is repeated if China’s unprincipled invasion of Vietnam actually creates animosity akin or greater than that against Americans, enough that there’s questions about who they would side with in a conflict and if they could be part of America’s containment strategy. There needs to be solidarity here.







  • stop pretending one month-long border war is equivalent to a decades long invasion and occupation that killed millions. Vietnam (and China) cozying up with Americans is their most shameful moments in their entire histories. In fact, China’s invasion was a result of them siding with the Khmer Rouge against the USSR and alongside America. This deeply shameful act of China’s was due to their failure to uphold anti-imperialist solidarity, and now we are risking repeating the same thing. Failure begets more failure. Nationalist resentments are used as wedges by the colonizers.