You need some kind of cue to keep in step. If you can see the other guys feet, that helps, but often tinted you can’t. The sound of yourself matching helps, but without some occasional cadence, or other governing factor, the speed of the match tends to change in a collective sort of way. My BMT platoon would get faster as we marched, unless the DI shouted at us occasionally.
Realistically, by way of being the political equivalent of a fleet-in-being.
Mostly, though, by way of ducking up anyone who looks like challenging our putative superiority.
I mean that she has really big boobies. If she just straight up asked for a hug, from literally anyone she can see at any given moment, some 85% or more of men would hug her just too feel those glorious breasts pressed against them.
I suspect a higher percentage of women would give her a hug, either for the same reason, or because they would just want to comfort the person who needs a hug badly enough to ask strangers.
If you were to use their network to take advantage of the features for anything that the “predator” behind doesn’t care, you’re fine.
But what will the predator care about tomorrow? Or next year? And how confident are you that aggregate data is not what they want, for whatever reason?
Removed by mod
That girl is not wanting for hugs.
My loyalty is for sale.
almost certainly.
And why should I take your word for it? I want testimonials from an array of five year olds, at least one of which is missing teeth.
I mean we as a group. Some of us will, but they will be decried by the rest of us. Too much, too far, too soon.
If we could all get on the same page, that would be one thing. But it’s like unions, isn’t it? Once man stopping work is just quitting. The whole factory stopping work is industrial action.
Scientists were so caught up with weather they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.
I don’t think we have the stomach to pull that off.
I’d love to be wrong, though.
Everybody isn’t going to lose. All of us will, but the rich assholes are gonna win.
Done people already end up dead most of the time? Our coverage is good, but it’s never gonna be that good.
No reason to cut it back, though.
Not before time.
Also a consideration, yes.
I mean, Rowling is a shit, but as far as I know she’s never laid hands on anyone. She can cause a lot of harm with hateful words and her significant public exposure, but that’s a different kind of thing.
That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.
Shouldn’t journalists be able to construct sentences?
More or less. No bonus points for me, I guess.