Ohhhh! You had me in the first half, not gonna lie!

If that means I’m a bot or used a bot, no. I just got real lucky on the third guess. Second guess is a word that couldn’t possibly have been right, but checks a lot of useful letters. I do that when my first guess doesn’t eliminate enough things for my liking.

Wordle 1,638 3/6

🟨⬛⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

#waffle1418 5/5

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩⭐🟩⭐🟩
🟩🟩⭐🟩🟩
🟩⭐🟩⭐🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

🔥 streak: 8

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Crossherd #273
⬛️⬛️🟩🟩🟩
⬛️🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛️
Time: 0:38

What.

I would thank you too. GET APPRECIATED BITCH.

#idontthinkyoureabitch

#sorryaboutthat

#igotcarriedaway

#thanksforthatdividerthingthough

…what?

🕹️ Retro Game Trivia — 2025-12-02 🎯 You revealed all letters with 3 mistakes! 🔥 Letter Streak: 1 🔢 Attempts: 16 💡 Clues used: 3

🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟥·🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🎯

A thought occurred to me watching this. Where does all that shit land?

The absolute blithering Nazi moron did something bad, dumb, and wrong? I’m shocked.

Imagine being a place people still want to go to.

People think they can trust the slop, is the thing. If they even think so far ahead, they probably think that an answer that exists on wikipedia will just be provided by the AI, saving them the time to search for it themselves. I’ve heard more than one horror story of ChatGPT use in particular backfiring on someone who somehow legitimately thought it was just another form of search engine, and didn’t verify the information provided.

Oh. I got bamboozled.

I thought the Onion was supposed to be satire.

Man that was fast. [Blank] Of Voice really tied me up longer than I care to admit.

You’re lecturing me for “defeatism” while you’ve said yourself:

Yeah the thousands of people who are going to die, be bankrupted, and or go homeless in the meantime probably don’t give a fuck about how it might change the elections in a year.

There was never a time in American history where checks and balances actually protected the rights of anyone. Nothing we are seeing today is new. This is how the system has always worked. Also hierarchical authority is incapable of fighting corruption.

So when you say it, it’s righteous outrage. When I say it, it’s “bootlicking”? That’s not conviction, that’s ego.

You’re not defending hope. You’re defending the sound of your own voice. If you can’t tell the difference between grief and complicity, that’s your literacy problem, not mine.

And coming from someone who lectures strangers about “polite forms of communication” while doing nothing but sneer and posture, you might want to sit this one out.

Yeah. I can look at post histories too. The difference is, I’ve offered concrete examples, a thing you are oddly reluctant to do, because any of my comments would fall directly under the explanation I already provided, one you’ve agreed with in your own words. One wonders what might motivate your dodging a challenge issued multiple times.

Cuomo is one of those politicians whose appeal completely baffles me. He comes across as self-serving to the core. He is exactly the kind of opportunistic, power-obsessed figure people usually say they can’t stand in politics. What’s the draw? The draw must be limited, since NYC rejected him in favor of Mamdani twice, but still.