

🤷♂️Ah, policies come and go…like the wind, right?😉Maybe the smarter thing we can do, until they get their priorities in line with ours, is to put up our own wind turbines, or whatever else is more abundant, and don’t ask anybody to bill us. 💪⚡✊
Making friends and caring for them. Writer at the intersection of technology, ethics, education, and imaginative futures. aka MagnetoMancer


🤷♂️Ah, policies come and go…like the wind, right?😉Maybe the smarter thing we can do, until they get their priorities in line with ours, is to put up our own wind turbines, or whatever else is more abundant, and don’t ask anybody to bill us. 💪⚡✊
Not sure if all the advanced reasoning in the world can actually find missing information, can it? So, at best, it can only make an educated leap of logic across the gap of information. But shouldn’t people be first alerted that such gaps have been found, and then make a call of action to find it? Otherwise, it just seems making up missing info is only going to generate the same kind of questionable material we are trying to get rid of. Wouldn’t it be smarter to just use more caution? Forget auto-deletion (too much like “auto-drive”), just highlight (or lowlight) the questionable material, AND then maybe copy it over to its own “Encyclopedia of Errors A-Z”. Just my idea. But, what do you think?
Its true, storms are when our normal wind turbines fail us, or we stop using them while we shield them somehow from the worst of it. I thought about this recently also, and I came to the conclusion that a single wind-wing pivoting on the top of a pole could be made to pump a generator inside the pole. It would only pump up and down, but it would seem to be able to weather hurricane force winds and still remain functional. What do you think?