![](https://cdn.pawb.social/mastodon-fe/accounts/avatars/109/576/403/358/362/147/original/0df80e5a0a255bfd.jpg)
![](https://pawb.social/pictrs/image/62e380b1-1242-4085-91f1-8da4510f1402.png)
1·
2 years agoCommenting with this as context: https://merveilles.town/@lrhodes/110555014534253768
Project 92 wouldn’t fit in with the Networked Communities philosophy that I use Fedi for. Normally that would just call for a silence, but given Meta’s extremely poor stewardship of people’s data in the past, especially those who didn’t opt into the data collection in the first place, I think a preemptive full-defederation is warranted rather than a silence. It seems like a Rule 6 matter, too.
@crashdoom @brodokk
I’m not asking for Meta to be chased out of the fediverse or for there to be a widespread fediblock. In fact, I think Project 92 could fit in just fine with masto.soc and all the other general-purpose instances, provided that they’re better data stewards moving forward than before. That’s just not why I’m here, and I don’t want them to feel entitled to my data, even if there’s no technical way to stop them from getting access to it.