the Trump regime can use Claude to decide which schoolchildren to bomb
Not true in the slightest. Trump can’t use Claude to decide which schoolchildren he can bomb.
He can use ChatGPT to decide which schoolchildren he can bomb.
(Anthropic was taken out back for saying they only wanted to identify which schoolchildren are there and not tell them which ones to bomb.)
“Small amount” is relative here. Not everybody needs to play Battlefield 6.
For just programming, 8GB is way more than enough. Even my old work laptop had only 8GB and the issues didn’t show up until I had multiple Office products + Teams + a browser open, not from any of my dev software.
Couldn’t agree more here, 1k dependencies would take a while to build even on my 9950x3d if only due to linking.
It seems to me like the the issue is the project is either too bloated, or large enough to justify a workstation build. Breaking it into smaller, independent parts would also help here.
Windows has supported Xbox controllers for many years now, and even decades ago I was playing games off a floppy disk using a gamepad.
The optimizations were worthless because Windows is the problem and focusing on gaming won’t solve the underlying issues with the OS or the high-level issues with its direction.
While you’re correct, we’re not the ones who need to be informed/convinced. The ones who do likely don’t care either and will blame Jews anyway.
8GB RAM isn’t a small amount (though by no means a lot). As far as RAM usage goes, the amount you need will scale with project+dependencies size, so for smaller projects, it shouldn’t be a problem at all.
8GB RAM doesn’t tell us about the rest of your system though. What CPU do you have? Is your storage slow? Performance is affected by a lot of factors. A slow CPU will naturally run programs slower, fewer hardware threads means less running in parallel, and slower storage means that reading incremental build data and writing it could be a bottleneck.
Right now it’s no big deal to any AI company because more code means more training for the AI, but will we get to the point that they’re happy with code output enough and then turn around claiming they own those?
At least in the US:
The vast majority of commenters agreed that existing law is adequate in this area and that material generated wholly by AI is not copyrightable.
So it seems unlikely that they would be able to claim any ownership.
As for the rest of your comment (the parts around ownership): you always own the copyright for any copyrightable work you create, including code. When you post on a website, according to the ToS of that site, you’re licensing your comment/code/whatever to the website (you need to for them to be able to publish your work on their website).
Some (many, most depending on what you use) websites overlicense your work and use it for other purposes as well (like GitHub), but in the US the judges have basically ruled that AI companies can pirate whatever works they want without any attempt to license them and still be fine, so the “overlicense” bit is more of a formality at this point anyway.
I’m more referring to Jeb because he did run for president, and it would make for a third Bush in office (H.W., his first son W., and his second son Jeb).
But yes, the succession line for Trump and his faction is different.
Let’s not get into what we think of the tree leaving him intact.
I can feel that from half a continent away, and what I would give to see him throw hands with another one…
Anyone else waiting for Jeb Bush to be elected president? I’m not, but that would show something about the elections here, and it wouldn’t be showing anything good (or new, for that matter).
there should be a fork of dotnet.
Dotnet is maintained by the .NET Foundation and is entirely open source. There are thousands of forks and local clones of the repos under that organization. Rather than hoping someone does this, it’d actually be a huge benefit to everyone for you to create a local clone of the repo and update it now and then, assuming you’re worried it might go down anyway.
telemetry being totally removed
DOTNET_CLI_TELEMETRY_OPTOUT=1, though it’s lame that it’s an opt-out and not opt-in. The CLI does give a fat warning on first use at least (which hilariously spams CI output). Opt-in would be so much better though, and opt-out by default is really not great.
an alternative to nuget.org
You can specify other package sources as well, so nothing technically stops someone from making their own alternative. That being said, you’d have to configure it for each project/solution that wants to use that registry.
Setting such a thing up could be insurance in case they pull anything in the future, too.
The main thing I’d be worried about here is nuget.org getting pulled. As far as I can tell, it’s run by MS, not the foundation. That’d be basically the entire ecosystem gone all at once. Fortunately, it’s actually super easy to create private registries that mirror packages on nuget.org, and it’s actually standard practice to do this at many companies. This means that at the very least it would be possible to recover some of the registry if this happened.
For a fork, I would think these would be the main goals I’d look for:
Please cite one example of Microsoft ever giving a fuck about users.
There aren’t many examples, but one that comes to mind is the adaptive controller. It’s not cheap, but it’s also presumably low volume, and it’s unbelievably configurable.
Outside of that, I’m out of ideas. Usually every good change comes in response to user backlash, from my experience anyway. I’ve moved over to Linux by now because I’m tired of dealing with what Windows has become.
This worked so well for Ars Technica. RIP Benj.
Surprisingly, this one’s completely new to me. It’s creative too. Gotta give praise where it’s due lol.
The way it was presented with regards to search engines was that it was supposed to pull data that was more up-to-date than when the model was trained. It does do that, actually, and provides better results too, on average anyway.
But that’s just one domain, and “better” doesn’t mean “good” or “accurate”. In most domains, at least where I work, we’ve found that RAG overcomplicates things for little benefit, unfortunately.
The way the current systems are trained simply doesn’t allow for accepting and adopting new information continuously.
As further evidence of this, RAG was supposed to enable this. Instead, we’ve found that RAG was nothing more than an overused buzz-term that has limited applications, and often results in hallucination anyway.
If he has a rash being formed by the cream, then that means he’s having a negative reaction to it and should not continue using it.
I’m curious what that rash could actually be. I have my hopes, but it doesn’t look like something good. If he really is taking an excessive amount of Aspirin (presumably to reduce the risk of a heart attack), then it could be as simple as his collar being too tight or rough on his skin. Based on the response they gave, that seems unlikely, though.
No idea who told you this, but MS employees use Teams exclusively.
As for it being terrible, it’s unfortunately hard to find a competitor that does better with the same feature set (video/screen sharing/text channels/sso/tenants/etc). Many get close (like Slack) but none have the whole package.
Since the bottom of an article is usually the least visible, I’ll paste this here to make it more visible:
“The Copilot Discord channel has recently been targeted by spammers attempting to disrupt and overwhelm the space with harmful content not related to Copilot. Initially, this spam consisted of walls of text, so we added temporary filters for select terms to slow this activity. We have since made the decision to temporarily lock down the server while we work to implement stronger safeguards to protect users from this harmful spam and help ensure the server remains a safe, usable space for the community,” a Microsoft spokesperson told Windows Latest.
Microsoft added that blocking terms such as “Microslop,” along with other phrases in the spam campaign, was not intended as a permanent policy but a short-term mitigation while the company manages to put additional protections in place.
Whether it’s true or not that the policy was temporary, I guess we’ll see.
This contradicts, unsurprisingly, Trump telling Anthropic to go fuck itself and the subsequent deal with OpenAI.
In any case, my comment was being made in jest because Trump’s admin is no stranger to violating policies, procedures, laws, and human rights.