Oh maybe - I just gave it a passing glance and focused on

You’re not automatically a Canadian citizen if you

marry a Canadian citizen

I wouldn’t be surprised at all if there’s an expedited path to residency.

'Fraid not.

Since 1970, Canada’s One China policy has recognized the PRC as the sole legitimate government of China, noting—neither challenging nor endorsing—the PRC government’s position that Taiwan is an inalienable part of its territory.

https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/trnsprnc/brfng-mtrls/prlmntry-bndrs/20230623/19-en.aspx

I also can’t say whether the site was studied sufficiently, but the timelines talked about in the article combined with bill C-15 allowing ministers to except entities from environmental laws if they are pursuing something to be deemed as encouraging economic growth pushes me well beyond the point where I’m willing to give the government the benefit of the doubt.

Fair enough - the article you linked described the study of Yucca Mountain as a storage for nuclear waste as having taken about 20 years, whereas as near as I can tell, they started exploratory drilling in Cold Lake in 2022. That’s…less than 20 years, no doubt about it.

nearly all CCS projects in the U.S. are actually enhanced-recovery projects that keep the oil and gas flowing

This is undoubtedly the case for his project, as well. Even the most optimistic viewpoint seems to be that it would make the effects of continued drilling and export of oil “less bad,” and do nothing to actually stop climate change.

Airborne Early Warning and Control is a specific type of thing, so an AEW aircraft is a particular type of aircraft.

I’m extremely skeptical of the whole thing, but I’m trying to learn more. The article you shared says:

Many geologists (myself included) believe there are places on Earth where long-term CO2 storage could be safely achieved, but it would require what scientists call “site characterization.” That means studying the location in enough detail to be confident that things put there will stay there. For example, the U.S. currently stores military radioactive waste in low-permeability salt formations in New Mexico, and there are numerous pending proposals to store CO2 in sandstones overlain by low-permeability shales in North Dakota.

Okay, so the CBC article seems to suggest that the site in question has been studied.

At the storage hub, the gas would be injected deep underground in the Basal Cambrian Sandstone formation, which sits one to two kilometres below the surface. The sponge-like sandstone has spaces that can be filled with CO2.

Above that formation is thick, non-porous rock salt that can act as a barrier to keep the carbon dioxide in the ground.

I have no idea whether it’s been studied sufficiently, but the author of the article you shared seems to think it can be effective if that step is taken.

And I think even the most optimistic proponents of carbon storage argue that it’s a means of mitigating the effects of heavy industry, not of making a meaningful difference in other ways. But they seem to think those mitigating effects can be important, and maybe even necessary?

Saab had bundled its surveillance aircraft proposal in with its pitch to sell Gripen-E fighter jets to Canada and promised to transfer technology so both aircraft could be fully manufactured locally. Carney did not say anything about whether Canada will proceed with the Gripen and limit its purchase of American-made F-35 jets.

Sounds like he’s vacating his seat entirely.

I’d definitely love to see some grants or other assistance to get people building their own capacity.

Sure, but this article is about the lack of utility-scale solar capacity (read: large solar plants), not small-scale, individual efforts.

That seems to be the same conclusion that MB Hydro has reached, as well.

I’m a little surprised that there hasn’t (as far as I know) been any talk about arming the coast guard - the way things are headed, it seems a little inevitable.

Claiming Canada was founded on the principle of strong provinces, Ms. Smith said, “Canada is very different from the United States and many other Western democracies. For example, the U.S. centralizes the majority of power and decision-making in its federal government. In Canada, we chose a decentralized federation composed of very unique and diverse provinces left to govern themselves in almost all matters with the main exceptions of national defence and international affairs.”

Absolutely unhinged.

I did a bit of a double-take here:

The Swiss-made, turbo-prop CT-157 Siskin II has been chosen to replace the Snowbird squadron. The planes are already on order and are being delivered for use as the air force’s initial pilot training aircraft.

Sure enough, these are not jet aircraft.

I think it’s perfectly understandable to at least attempt to rein in an increasingly rogue province by making a mutually acceptable deal. I don’t believe it will help, or at least not much, but I can understand the attempt.

The lesson is obvious to provinces: dont follow federal laws you dont agree with.

That said, I can’t really disagree with this point.

Ultimately, the proposed pipeline still seems to be contingent on finding a private entity that thinks it’s a good investment, and I’m not at all convinced that that will ever happen. We’ll see.

The counterpoint (and it’s a deeply shitty, cynical counterpoint) is that the original targets weren’t realistic to begin with, and would have been missed, just like every other climate target ever.

Is this better? History suggests it probably isn’t. Is it worse? Maybe, but the depressing truth is it might just be a lateral move.

And that’s the strongest “defense” I’m able to muster, which is pretty depressing.

There’s a lot of good context in here, even as I’m still deeply conflicted about this strategy.

“The final Canada-Alberta MOU implementation agreement will put Canada’s target of net zero by 2050 well out of reach,” Rick Smith, president of the Canadian Climate Institute, said in a written statement.

The Pembina Institute said its modelling showed the carbon pricing schedule included in the implementation agreement would result in an additional 230 megatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions over the next 15 years.

The federal government had no modelling of its own to offer on Friday.

The policy left behind by Justin Trudeau’s government was stronger on paper. But Carney might argue his policy is stronger in practice — not least because it was achieved via political consensus with a conservative Alberta premier.

…

In defiance of the federal benchmark, Smith’s government had frozen the province’s industrial price at $95 per tonne last year. (Meanwhile, Saskatchewan has stopped collecting an industrial carbon price altogether.) And because of inefficiencies in Alberta’s pricing system, the effective price was much lower.

A private backer was a requirement in the original MoU, and I can’t tell from the article whether that’s still the case.

If so, the whole thing may well be a non-starter.

In the short term, I think Carney is prioritizing “re-industrializing” the country over certain environmental protections.

I certainly have hope that the worst effects will be mitigated by things like what you’re describing, but…I’m just not sure.

I tend to think that most deadlines will be missed, and most budgets will be overrun…the only question is degree.