Copying is not theft. “Copyright” is actually a privilege, a copy monopoly. Its original length of 10 years was a reasonable compromise between the right to freely share culture and the desire for artists to be able to live off of the incomes of their work. The current “70 years after creator’s death” is absurd and oppressive.
The real problem is that AI companies copyright/monopolize the things they copied.
Here in Sweden we just don’t use Sir/Madam at all. Everyone refers to each other by their first name, even in professional settings.
Jesus christ! That’s around the median monthly income in my country. And I come from a rich country.
My rent is around a fifth of that. Please tell me the $3000-4000 range is at least for a family apartment.
Unfortunately, that’s not just a porn thing.
The secret is the erosion of the welfare state, high unemployment levels, butchered unions, dropped funding for non-profit hobby/sports organizations and money laundering of tax money into “profits” through a messed-up voucher system for schools and hospitals.
Not to mention the extremely corrupt law of public contracting that always results in the lowest-bidding - and thus shittiest/sloppiest - business getting to do all infrastructure work (and inevitably messing it up and then charging extra for fixing their own mistakes). Ironically, that law was intended to combat alleged corruption. We had very low levels of corruption before that law was made.
TL;DR: thorough neoliberal destruction of Swedish society.
Something in a similar vein for her specifically to consider:
Changing your last name to Bolsonaro does not make you related to the president of Brazil.
On the one hand, I agree that China is being hypocritical. On the other hand, all businesses within a country should be owned by people who actually live and spend their lives in that country. It is one of many steps that can be taken to democratize an economy.