• 3.71K Posts
  • 1.65K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle






















  • The Heritage Department said in a statement on Wednesday that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC)'s new requirements would “impose costs” on streamers “which could ultimately fall on Canadian consumers through higher prices.”

    “This is not the time to raise the cost for Canadians,” Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters after meeting with his cabinet.

    The government also said it is investing $600 million to “provide stability and immediate support to Canada’s audio and audiovisual sectors and to keep our culture accessible and affordable for all Canadians.”

    Oh, so instead of reclaiming any profit out of an American company we’ll just shake it out of Canadian pockets instead.
















  • *Before Trump was elected. I think a Trudeau led Liberal party would have had a much weaker showing, but not as weak as the polling referenced here would suggest. The Conservative falloff was mostly a result of the fallout from the new (at the time) Trump administration and the common understanding that the Conservative party is the pro-US party. The Liberals were able to seize the mantle of Canadian nationalism in the face of that disaster. In another world where Trump was not president but Carney still takes over the Liberals, I don’t think we see nearly the same swing. In a world where Trump is president but the Liberals stick with Trudeau, I think the most likely outcome would have been either a weak Con minority or a very weak Liberal minority.


  • I have no idea whether it’s been studied sufficiently, but the author of the article you shared seems to think it can be effective if that step is taken.

    I also can’t say whether the site was studied sufficiently, but the timelines talked about in the article combined with bill C-15 allowing ministers to exempt entities from environmental laws if they are pursuing something deemed as encouraging economic growth pushes me well beyond the point where I’m willing to give the government the benefit of the doubt.

    the most optimistic proponents of carbon storage argue that it’s a means of mitigating the effects of heavy industry, not of making a meaningful difference in other ways. But they seem to think those mitigating effects can be important, and maybe even necessary?

    Maybe, but unfortunately the reality is that:

    nearly all CCS projects in the U.S. are actually enhanced-recovery projects that keep the oil and gas flowing, and every new barrel of oil and cubic foot of gas sold and burned is putting more CO2 into the atmosphere. So not only do these kinds of projects not help, but they perpetuate our use of fossil fuels at a critical moment in history when we need to do the opposite.

    Which is also why O&G advocates like Danielle Smith support it.