Especially with true crime, the way things are presented could alter how the content is perceived. For example, Making a Murder took time to walk the audience through the entire trial (I’m not going to debate the perception the film makers left out important facts that influence the narrative).

On the flip side a more recent series like This Is the Zodiac Speaking, only focused on one suspect, never questioned the testimony of the children as being faulty memories or fact checked well known details about the crimes mentioned. My point is, this documentary was on a subject that was better well known and didn’t aim to present the children as telling their own side of events; it straight up makes the assumption what they said must be true because they personally knew ALA. On top of this, they featured Robert Graysmith, the author of the book Zodiac which is well known for being factually inaccurate, and doesn’t challenge his research. And at the end, the film makers failed to get the DNA test results for a test they commissioned. What deadline existed that they couldn’t tell the viewer what the result was?

Sorry, that documentary in particular irritates me for how factually inaccurate and onesided it was. My overall point is that true crime in particular seems to just be looking for whatever will get views. Not a lot of the documentaries that have come out in this period have produced well made series or ethically honest content. Is it entertainment or is it bringing awareness to what occurred or the people affected?

The problem I have is the quality of the film making. Regardless of the content, if it isn’t well made, probably wouldn’t see through the whole thing.

Severance

This is why I get upset seeing people who openly participate in the fandom.

This meant to be satire?

Considering he didn’t understand as a child that staring at Bulma naked was not appropriate, I’m not surprised he doesn’t know what a penis is.

EDIT: Yes I read that conversation as the voices of Christopher Sabat and Sean Schemmel.

G.I.N.A.S.F.S.

deleted by creator

Didn’t anti-virus, spyware and/or malware apps flag Epic as malicious when it first launched?

I know this isn’t quite the same but I’m getting Heavens Gate vibes. Not good.

I played education games on a Apple II in 1998; I was in the first grade.

If you are gonna rope us Trekkies into this, I’ll just ask if they want a salt tablet first. Then set my phaser to kill.

Or they got it very accurate? 🤷

That sounds like what could happen.

EDIT: I’m not saying we have to do exactly that. It just seems like the way Trump supports Putin feels like he would do this.

Well it was already pretty bad when the U.S. flag became a co-opted symbol for hate.

Uh… I regret this.

Little Saddie… in the ass.

A related tangent: Ghost Recon had a plot about Russia invading Georgia in 2008. That game was from 2001.

I thought these were cigarettes at first glance.

I guess wherever there is support of the Israeli state, there is a Nazi behind that.

Idiocracy 2, where the dumbest priest ever is sent into the future to save Catholicism.