They should sell products users want at prices they’re willing to pay. Without abuse, deception, or other malicious acts.
They should sell products users want at prices they’re willing to pay. Without abuse, deception, or other malicious acts.


Off the top of my head …
I keep seeing job posts that have requirements like “must be excited about AI tools”. If the shit was good people would be excited on their own.
It’s all slop from the worst, soulless, people.
Sometimes the manual steps grow like weeds. Where I’m at now, they haven’t invested in automation much at all. Now deploys take all day. Making a code change is a sweaty manual regression search process. It’s bad.
New players really should be told to play Pathfinder 2e at this point, not D&D5e
It’s unfortunate that DND 5e is the sole mega popular game.
People who want fantasy tactical combat would probably do well with Pathfinder 2e. But people who just want to tell a fun story would probably have a lot more fun with something lighter, like Fate.
There’s so many games out there and most don’t get the love they deserve


I have no interest in rental nor subscriptions
DND is a weird mix of too many rules and not enough rules.


See also: capitalism more generally


Match group should be broken up.


You’re doing more harm to the environment and shared spaces than the person riding the bus.


We used to do retrospectives at one of my old jobs, because everywhere loves cargo-culting agile and scrum stuff.
I quickly realized that a lot of the problems were largely outside the team’s control. It was shit like “The CEO doesn’t believe in designers or UX, so he won’t hire one, so we spend a lot of time doing that work badly ourselves.” Or, “management is making us spend all this time in ‘planning meetings’ so we don’t get anything done”
Stuff that has easy solutions, but we can’t do because some idiot or powerful cry-baby is in the way.


My last job was pretty good about code reviews, when people actually spent time on them. My front end code got much better when the front-end expert actually reviewed it.
My current job, code reviews are a rubber stamp farce and I’ve seen total garbage sail though. The code base is a tire fire. These things are related.


I suggested at my current job that we adopt a policy of fixing things as we go. Boss wasn’t interested. He said his boss said “he doesn’t want people gold plating things”.
Okay. I guess we’ll keep this tower of bash scripts that breaks once a month.


I remember okcupid had a question (back when their system was based on answering questions) that asked “is it possible for a partner to be too ambitious?”
I was like “clearly some of you assholes never read Macbeth”.
Also, the CEO of my old job was on the dating apps at the same time as me. Despite us being about the same age, I’m confident very few people would match with both of us. “Never worked, just grad school and CEO founder” seekers don’t also seek me.


Well, yes, though my direct manager isn’t the worst. He’s trying to protect me from other teams that might get pissy.
One of my friends is a product manager type and his analysis was basically “if stakeholders don’t care it’s not a problem, even if by any reasonable metric it is a problem”. So. Here we are.


Well surely you can agree that letting men into women’s change rooms
If the idea is that that’s a no-no because men are sexually attracted to women, then I must remind you that gay people exist.
If the idea is that men cannot be trusted, then there are many other spaces where men have power that should be examined first.


I thought about it but people are so sensitive here. If they broke something and couldn’t merge they’d probably raise a big stink, and then there’s good odds the checks would be removed “because they’re adding friction” or some nonsense. My boss has already warned me about staying in my lane.
These people have never done any automated testing of any sort. No linter. No unit tests. And they don’t seem to want to.


Sounds about right.
I’m using GitHub actions at work because this place is extremely dysfunctional, and I can just add GitHub actions without it being a whole “research spike planning meeting impact analysis” six week journey.
I took it from “there are absolutely no checks and Bob broke the environment because he pushed up a change that’s just invalid syntax” to… well, I couldn’t make it block the build on failures but at least now when Bob breaks it again I can point to the big red X and ask why he merged with an error.


Skyrim. It was at best “fine” for me. I really dislike level scaling. The combat felt unsatisfying. I don’t remember the story. It’s not weird like Morrowind. The magic and enchanting was over-simplified.
But for many people it’s their grand joy. So I guess that’s good for them.
Funnily enough it would probably be better for the majority of shareholders.