I think it has a lot to do with that we are trying to copy a model that only works for the mighty. Youtube depends on surveillance automatized algorithms. The surveillance is what makes their service work. This is not a type of algorithm we should copy from youtube. But that is what peertube has done. They rely on an algorithm that plays on surveillance. This means that the peertube experience is subpar.

What we should do instead is rely on algorithms that rely on people actively pointing out to likeminded videos. To let people be the algorithm just like how people were the algorithm of the early web. Perhaps that we associate our channel with other likeminded channels. Or that we actively point people towards the videos we think are relevant to the current video.

They always do.

In other words, you say that we should just give up.

I think the way we are trying to make technology sound sophisticated and our refusal to reinvent language makes technology become much less accessible than what they should be.

I’ll not say what I’m using, because I haven’t figured it out yet.

However, what I seek are:

• Frugile / lightweight / nighsome - Using few resources so that it is easy to take ownership over. This will also increase flexibility.
• Open - Not restrictive licensing. Post-dominating mindset.
• Human Selfhostability - The approach should be as accessible as possible for anyone seeking to take ownership over it. Frugality is also important to achieve this.
• Human centric - People should not adapt to the approach, but the approach has to adapt to people.

I put this comment out to check how brainwashed people are. Just because something is open source doesn’t mean that the software in it’s totality is good. It’s a good place to start for sure, but we need to delve deeper into what we demand from our software.

deleted by creator

It’s open source, so it’s fine.

PrivacyBrowser is a really good browser in my opinion. But I cant do an analysis on its privacy.

I will add that I love how they handle bookmarks.

Ofcourse, whats your email?

I can’t get through EBADENGINE error messages spawned by npm.

By the way, could you recommend some epub reader for linux by any chance?

Thanks:) I’ll peek and see if it sparks me!

I haven’t delved into the philosophy of idealism, so I’m a seed in that. Just looked up the wikipedia article when you brought it up. Found it to be an umbrella term, so I couldn’t really determine my stead on it.

Gotcha mate.

Quick question, is a doctor an idealist?

Well, ditto then.

deleted by creator

Yes, unwellness lokening is going away from the material frame because unwellness lokening greatens our ability to think wholistically. It doesn’t weaken, but greatens our ability to systematically respond to the rampage of might and machine*.

With this framing, we relight our attention away from the abstract, towards the value of life. This weakens mights ability to coerce us in that we move away from an unliving world towards a living world. Where we view life as worthy, instead of as exploitable. Where we do not simply see a forest as a source of income, but rather as something that lives and are worthy of care.

We don’t need science to see that Gaja is sick, we already know this. We know that might and machine is the source of these unwellnesses. Simply withdrawing our support and establishing mightless and samholding societies are enough to ensure samlife with Gaja. We can do this through lokenings such as moving away from overproduction towards frugile societies. Let societies not be governed by leaders, but grown by guiders. No science is needed to understand this, only an agreement about what society should be grounded upon.

*Using machine as a way to refer to the systems controlled by might that undermines our free will.

I thanked it was beans!