minfapper

We saw this play out with GMO foods:

If it’s such a benign and maybe even beneficial thing to do then why are you hiding it? What possible reason could you have not to label that?

later:

It’s specifically labelled, therefore it must be bad right? If we didn’t need to worry about it, it wouldn’t be labelled.

What does it mean now?

I bought it specifically because its soundtrack was absolutely amazing (not knowing anything about the game itself).

Unfortunately, it did not play as well as it sounded 😿

I mean, generators exist and you usually need a male to male cable to plug into your house

I thought most of the attacks we get from China are state sponsored

Microsoft’s focus is entirely on business customers. Xbox doesn’t align at all with any of their other business strategies.

I’m sure they’d love to sell it off, but it’s like one of the biggest (if not the actual biggest) publishers in the world so I don’t think there’s any company that can afford to buy it.

They could split it up and sell it off in pieces, but they’re not sure if Wall Street will reward them for it. So the best bet for them is to keep it as a buffer for layoffs whenever they need to raise their stock price.

The bullshit part it that our current economic system makes this the most logical path.

tl;dr: Instead of blaming Microsoft for doing layoffs, maybe we should be asking ourselves why we let 3 trillion dollar companies exist in the first place

Damn, your hair grew fast in the first 4 months

So… do they get laid or not?

whether GLP-1 use among those with diabetes had an effect on mental health, self-rated health, employment, and marriage. Yet, in a surprising twist, they found that the drugs had no meaningful impact on these categories.

So, we get to lose weight without depression? How is that not a win?!

Gets the popcorn ready

Eh, it’s less about defeatism and more that I’m watching a fight between two assholes so I’m finding it hard to empathize with either side.

Like… Publishers regularly screwed over consumers, content creators, and tried to break the web multiple times. They can bleed for all I care

I hate to break it to you, but we’re never getting rid of AI.

Like how we will forever have trace amounts of cesium and PFAS/microplastics in our blood, AI generated content is going to be around in most things.

The question is will you also use it for good, or just leave it for the bad actors only?

By default pull requests my new contributors require approval from someone with write-access to the repo before running actions.

These repos have specifically decided to change a setting to make them not require approval for anyone. The UI to change that setting explicitly warns you about exactly this attack, so this “article” feels like a non-item trying to farm engagement.

The core of the problem trickles down to weak CI/CD configurations that grant pull requests (PRs) more permissions than they should have.

How exactly do their competitors like codeberg do better in preventing that?

What recent announcement?

I’m very confused. I thought season 4 is already airing.

Or is it on mid season hiatus and this trailer is for the second half?

You know, people give Tesla a lot of flak, but at least they never did dumb stuff like this.

If only their CEO wasn’t a fascist… 😞

Does it have to be an SBC? I’ve had great success with a second hand Lenovo Thinkpad

Nah they accept a range of inputs because they know different humans can’t consistently produce a single answer.

Maybe if this becomes more popular and gets abused they’ll narrow the range.

The problem is that nobody enjoys porting bugfixes to old LTS releases and thus won’t volunteer to do it.

So, you either have to use some Enterprise OS that you pay a license to make people do it, or just miss out on bug fixes.

KDE community stopped releasing LTS versions when they realized they were doing the latter.