“Trust but verify” … which just means doing due diligence as a professional, whether the crap^HH^HHquality code and documentation is written by a human or AI.

Humans are incredibly good at saying dumb shit while making it seem like it could be the right thing, but LLMs are arguably better at it.

And you, and I, and everyone here, will fall for it… not always, but too often. We are all lazy thinkers by nature.

If the lowest paid intern gets to use AI, then it will probably help them configure it properly… the docs generally aren’t bad (of the ones I’ve seen/used), but they’re not newbie/intern level docs.

edit: That’s a lot of downvotes for suggesting AI is useful at a primarily language/grammatical problem (ie. helping to crafting security/sandbox policy DSLs from terse docs and examples)? I detect some gut-reaction insecurities in these parts. 🙃