The types of information processed includes names, dates of birth, gender and ethnicity

A section marked: “type of personal data to be shared” by police with the government includes various types of criminal convictions, but also listed is the age a person first appeared as a victim, including for domestic violence, and the age a person was when they first had contact with police.

Also to be shared – and listed under “special categories of personal data” - are “health markers which are expected to have significant predictive power”, such as data relating to mental health, addiction, suicide and vulnerability, and self-harm, as well as disability.

I didn’t think it was possible for me to hate a country this much. On the bright side, this will reduce trust in the police as people begin to catch on that literally having contact with the police could have you marked for life.

I’m going to be real. Arguing about a hyperbolic statement is not something I have the time or energy to do. I’ll simply retract my statement and disengage. And honestly, I should also be logging off social media for a while.

deleted by creator

That’s a pretty good position ngl

deleted by creator

Are you a corporate executive with thoughts on this topic or a tip to share? Contact Jason Del Rey at jason.delrey@fortune.com, jasondelrey@protonmail.com, or through messaging apps Signal and WhatsApp at 917-655-4267. You can also contact him on LinkedIn or at @delrey on X, @jdelrey on Threads, and on Bluesky.

This is how the article is signed off

Trump is not reviving economic planning or industrial policy with his tariffs. Just because the US needed to re-industrialise, and just because protectionism would have been part of any re-industrialisation policy does not mean that Trump’s policy is not phenomenally short sighted.

The simple fact is that without imposition of

1. Maximum import quotas (differentiated by good)
2. Capital export controls
3. A strong welfare program
4. An expansionary fiscal budget
5. Nationalisation of key industries

It is practically impossible for the US to re-industrialise. And each of these policies is critical because

1. Import quotas can directly limit the quantity of goods coming in unlike tariffs which have huge distortions effects and have a difficult to predict outcome
2. Preventing the outflow of dollars prevents people from cheating Import quotas or tariffs. Preventing the outflow of machinery allows that to be invested in your country.
3. This is needed to create a workforce that is actually healthy and smart enough to fix the economy.
4. This is needed to run your economy to its physical limits rather than artificially created financial ones.
5. This is needed because re-industrialisation requires the bourgeois class yo give up on a lot of profits, so you need to take control of industries away from them.

If the US wanted to, they could go into Iranian airspace

The US should learn how to win against geurellas in the third world before trying to fight against actual militaries.

To add on to what the others have said, the compiler will also optimise your code (which is why professional coders write in common patterns as much as possible, so the compiler can recognise them and optimise).

So many times, you literally won’t even have the same program.

Also machine understandable code (assembly or 1s and 0s) is different depending on the processor used. You could give me machine code made for a risc-v processor and I could reconstruct a c program that made it. But if I had the same program compiled for an x86 processor …

I am shidding myself in public

^^^

The dinosaurs

People use it to make fun of edgelords by posting them with this image. Although I’ve never heard anyone make fun of the image itself.

Firstly, America is not nazi Germany 2.0, nazi Germany was America 2.0.

Secondly, Who will declare war on America?

China? They already are preparing for WW3 scenarios and Trump’s statements do nothing to change the timeline of preparations

Russia? They are already at (proxy) war with the US

Iran or North korea? They have enough defensive capabilities to have a good chance of defeating a US invasion (which appears to be a matter of when not if). But no real offensive capabilities against the US (discounting US satelites).

India or NATO minus the US? Their ideological conviction would lead them to siding with American fascism rather than against it. Like, why would they invade the heartland of world-historical fascism when they themselves are fascist?

We just gonna sit around and let Nazi Germany 2.0 happen?

Modern america doesn’t a tenth the (relative to the rest of the world) military or economic power that Nazi Germany did. And that’s because other countries haven’t been sitting on their asses all this time. They’ve been struggling for decades to create the multipolar world.

EU politicians reading this: Got it, make deals with nazis, purge BRICS. Fuck US (sexually)

call me, we can talk, I am lonely too

We can chat via text. I can barely handle calls with people I know.

Sixth 5 year plan completed

illuminating inequality

vote socialist

What the hell has this fictional “CPA” been doing for 30 years if inequality still needs to be illuminated and elections need to be fought

Inside and outside the White House, advisers say Trump is unbowed even as the world reels from the biggest increase in trade hostilities in a century. They say Trump is unperturbed by negative headlines or criticism from foreign leaders.

Therein lies the appeal of Trump

Numerous more sophisticated approaches were developed than the one Trump selected, people familiar with the matter said.

Would mind sharing them?

The White House demanded that Britain and India change their health and sanitation rules to make it easier to export U.S. agricultural products.

Worry not, the nurglites are in control. Bird flu for everyone.

In Brazil, India and Europe, they targeted digital regulations that have entangled U.S. tech giants.

God I hope the EU doesn’t use this as an excuse to scrap privacy laws (like they keep trying with chat control).

White House spokesman Kush Desai said Trump had assembled “the best and brightest economic team in modern history” to develop the tariff plan.

The best and brightest of mainstream economists? Wouldn’t be surprised if this was actually true, given how dumb economists are.

That’s true, but I don’t think settlers are considered civilians under international law either way

Tariffs and tax cuts are basically the only 2 things in which trump actually believes.

Maybe it could be possible. I’ll have to look into it.

No, I don’t know what I’d do with them.

Actually maybe I could use them to compute some things but that’d be a different investigation entirely.