If it’s ok to punch nazis then it can open the door to punch other groups with different opinions.

That is understandable, but no one should be harmed for saying “group” are dumb, “group” are evil. Inciting violence against a person or group is wrong depending on how much influence the inciter has to cause real physical harm in the near future. Saying someone stole or SA’d with no proof or not good proof isnt part of free speech too.

That is good news, im new here and have to learn a lot about how these instances work to make my own.

Advocating for violence against a group is wrong, but it shouldn’t be combatted with violence to silence them. The only reason they feel free to talk about genociding people is because they know they can censor and ban people who talk about doing it to them instead. In a nearly no censorship playing field everyone can be hit with the same type of hatred with no special censorship control for a few groups. If the hateful group convincess most people to be violent against a group it will only prove humanity isn’t worth saving.

It sucks we have to be manually approved by a person in order to post here. I’m almost a free speech absolutist, only doxing and threatening to physically harm someone or a group of people unjustifiably shouldnt be tolerated. Everything else is fair to use publicly.

No one should have to worry about being harmed physically or legally at least.

All speech should be protected, even if the shirt character was replaced with a bIm guy