More than a thousand Harvard students walked out of their commencement ceremony yesterday to support 13 undergraduates who were barred from graduating after they participated in the Gaza solidarity encampment in Harvard Yard.

Asmer Safi, one of the 13 pro-Palestinian student protesters barred from graduating, says that while his future has been thrown into uncertainty while he is on probation, he has no regrets about standing up for Palestinian rights.

  • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    26 months ago

    While it’s true that many people’s careers post-college are not directly related to their degree, it’s still valuable to employers.

    What a degree says is that an individual can sucessfully complete a project that takes years of work and at least enough professionalism to get through.

    • @yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      I see this point used frequently - and it isn’t wrong … but it’s only half of a statement. In that time let’s say someone holds a position for 4 years of experience. These two things are not equally weighted, but very similar at that point. As time progresses that piece of paper continues to lose value when compared to experience in the field.

      The degree is, in essence, a signal that someone has achieved at least the base level of competency in a field and stuck with it for x time. So assuming 2 parties with 0 work experience vie for a job naturally the degree holder will win out. It gets murkier when comparing someone with 4 years with in field experience to a 4 year degree holder with 0 experience.

      The point I aimed to make was just that. It’s a perfectly reasonable assertion.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        There’s a world of difference in dedication to completing a 4-year project when you’re being paid to be there working and when you are not.

        Sucessfully completing a college degree shows that someone is driven, can accomplish goals, and make forward-looking decisions.

        • @yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          I respectfully disagree with the difference between someone working on a project or job for 4 years being less “driven” than their counterpart. Execution and follow through are based on per individual. Downplaying the efforts simply because it doesn’t align with your perspective is incorrect. Both individuals are putting forth similar efforts to learn a trade. As I asserted above.

          • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Someone simultaneously spending money, building debt, and foregoing income for years to complete a project that will result in better longer-term prospects absolutely shows drive and a focus on the long-term.

            Not going to college doesn’t mean someone doesn’t have those qualities, but the degree is prrof of minimum qualifications and drive.

            I know everything necessary to build a house from the ground up, but if you want an electrical upgrade you should hire a licensed electrician and not me because they have the credentials to back it up.

            • @yggstyle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              As I asserted earlier - you are heavily downplaying the efforts of someone working in the same field for the same amount of time and treating it differently. That simply isn’t a fair assessment and is being used to sell a statement that is a half truth. Both individuals have something to show for their time investment that highlights their value. One has a degree which, for the reasons you have specified, is valuable - one has 4 years of experience in the field highlighting they are competent enough and skilled enough to be an asset to the same company for 4 years. To head off the followup: does every worker at a job have 100% “hire this man” energy? Certainly not. Conversely does every graduate have what it takes to succeed in a field? Absolutely not. With that in mind both individuals applying to a new job with the aforementioned experience/degree will, and should be, weighted similarly.

              With regard to your electrician example: a licensed electrician is just that. When you hire one do you care if he got a degree in EE prior to getting his license? The result is what matters. This is the point I keep driving at. If I hire a lawyer, I could care less what is hanging on his office wall - I care that he passed the bar and wins consistently. There are many paths to the same result… don’t simply scorn one because it is a path you wouldn’t take.

              • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                16 months ago

                You literally can’t take the bar without a law degree. The bar is just a test at the end of the journey.

                Because the ability to pass one test is no replacement for a holistic education in the law.

                Hell, I know more about the law in my particular field than 99% of attorneys. But that doesn’t mean shit in a courtroom.

                Do you care of your electrician is licensed? You should. Because someone can know enough about electricity to get by and make things work and still be dangerous. That shortcut they used to steal a return off a separate circuit to save a wire run in the garage works great until the GFI fails on a short and you get electrocuted using the sink.

                Credentials are important. Some college degrees are essential for their specific jobs (doctors, lawyers, scientists). Others are useful skillsets combined with a degree that acts as a credential that says “independantly accomplishes multi-year complex goal involving 40+ successful milestone tasks (courses) with no supervision required.”