Safe Streets Rebel’s protest comes after automatic vehicles were blamed for incidents including crashing into a bus and running over a dog. City officials in June said…

  • GladiusB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    The problem is no one will use them. Busses are full of homeless people and people that NEED to use them than they want to. I was a bus driver for many years. They don’t stop where everyone wants to go and it’s a necessity to most instead of an integrated way of life. The entire American culture would need to change.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Absolutely! I drove bus in the city in question. So I thought I would add my anecdote.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        For sure. However do you change something that is mostly government subsidized and everyone that manages the systems are happy with the operations?

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          everyone that manages the systems are happy with the operations?

          Is that the case? I suppose most car drivers are not happy with sitting in traffic jams. Better public transport would help.

          • GladiusB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            They are happy with their paychecks and lives. Yes.

    • @howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I don’t know how it is in the US, but i can tell you that public transit is pretty good here in my city. A self-driving taxi would still be the ideal experience for sure, but taking a bus isn’t that much worse, and it’s definitely better than driving myself.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I totally agree. I am not sure how that will happen.

    • Spzi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Busses are full of homeless people and people that NEED to use them than they want to.

      I heard this is the case in the United States. In Europe, as far as I can tell, it’s more common that people from all backgrounds take public transit, including ‘higher’ class people. Of course exceptions and reasons exist.

    • @xSPYXEx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      That literally just proves that we do in fact need more busses. More vehicles would allow for a wider coverage with more frequent and well organized stops.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I like your idea, but implementing it is a bigger issue than you may realize. The transit systems in San Francisco are based on counties. Therefore it is a completely different governing body for each way out of the city proper.

        But coverage does not change the usage. That is several millions if not billions to reroute a busline to go to a different area. If only 10 people get on every two hours then another bus in a more populated area is more financially sound. We can sit and say more buses are the answer, but people being willing to get on to the bus is a part of the equation. I don’t see how you are going to eliminate 2 extra hours out of everyone’s commute and make them buy into it.