• @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    Your laptop would become suicidal the second it had to start serving streaming, 4k video to dozens of people, much less hundreds or thousands.

    • @interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      My laptop can copy files at 15 mbps, very very easily. Hundreds ? Again piss easy, that’s what bittorrents are for, even easier when the swarms takes care of all the traffic. The more people are 10 or so and the faster it will copy itself. Do you cloud people still know how to copy files or was that arcane knowledge lost to the sands of 1995 ?

      • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I hate the cloud you perfidious incompetent. The only thing more stupid than the “cloud” is your belief that you can serve hundreds, if not thousands, of simultaneous streams,possibly 1080, most likely 4k, from your 15mbps laptop.

      • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You must not want a youtube competitor then, if your goal is to just okay-ly stream to just a couple dozen or so people.

          • @interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            You are correct. Nearly all youtube channels can be fully served off a single laptop. 260 concurrent streams at 1080p 3mbps is achievable over gigabit ethernet. Very few channels exceed this for any appreciable amount of time. And in those cases we can leverage a very small amount of the client’s ressources to further propagate the stream. This can be done with repurposed bittorrent dht. Now all we need is federated RSS and a locally running content curation algorithm and a social review system (like buttons and reputation history)