The president often had a weak, raspy voice during his first debate against Trump, in what Democrats had hoped would be a turning point in the race.

  • @Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    While I agree, it’s way too late in the game to change up now. There’s no strong candidate waiting in the wings. It’s not about willing, it’s about alternatives.

      • John Richard
        link
        fedilink
        125 months ago

        There are so many better options at this point. I can’t help but shake that the two party system is doing exactly what it was designed to do. Make people think that mediocrity is the best we can get if we’re lucky.

        • @btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          We got FDR and LBJ and Lincoln and Washington. So if you think that then that’s on your own faulty thinking.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            35 months ago

            You’re free to keep supporting Biden at this point but hopefully when you see all the Democratic news outlets saying the same things tomorrow and this coming week and the polls showing Biden’s support dropping you’ll reconsider

            • @btaf45@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              WTF are you talking about. What I want is for Biden to drop out and be replaced by Gavin Newsom. Nor did I vote for Biden in the 2020 primary. I’m just saying that you’re completely wrong that the system cannot produce good candidates since we’ve had great presidents in the past.

    • @retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      125 months ago

      There doesn’t have to be a strong candidate, just anyone stronger than Biden who’s basically zombie-crawling across the floor.

      He absolutely can be replaced at this stage, and by nearly anyone.

      • @btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        He absolutely can be replaced at this stage, and by nearly anyone.

        He absolutely can’t be legally replaced unless he agrees to that. And the replacement would automatically be Harris unless she agrees to allow someone else. The DNC charter says that only the voters can select the nominee. Changing that charter this close to an election likely wouldn’t stand up in courts. The only way to replace Biden would be to convince him to step down.

      • Blackbeard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        He absolutely can be replaced at this stage, and by nearly anyone.

        Only if they can convince him to step aside and let someone else run. At this point the voters have selected 3,904 delegates who are contractually obligated to cast a vote for him at the Convention. If the delegates somehow simply ignored the primaries, they’d be quite literally ignoring the will of their voters and taking matters into their own hands. It’s alarming how many on the left (who presumably had a problem with the DNC’s treatment of Bernie in 2016) are cheering for the DNC to heavily influence the primary process again. I don’t necessarily disagree that something drastic needs to be negotiated, but the irony of this is really hard to ignore.

        • @retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          This is the way the DNC set their rules up, they’ve been ok using the system to kneecap progressives, I see no reason that they shouldn’t do that to Biden. I’m not precious about the DNC and I have no illusion that it’s democratic, so they just need to stop pretending they’re being held back by principles and just pull the levers they always pull to control the convention outcome.

          • Blackbeard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yes, and the rules were voted on by party members before the primary started. They’re now in place, and they’re obligated to respect them until this process plays out. Same thing happened in 2016. Say what you will about whether the rules were “fair” or not, they were agreed upon before Iowa, and they were respected through the Convention.

            The way you use “kneecap progressives” tells me you’re conflating DNC primary rules and campaign finance. The two are not the same thing. They could do to Biden what they did to Bernie and blast the airwaves with damaging, misleading attacks, but none of that would fundamentally change the fact that the primary rules were agreed upon and are immutable until the Convention comes to a close.

            And to reiterate, it’s not “principles” that are holding them back. It’s a contractual obligation whose violation would open them up to civil litigation. Voters picked delegates and they’re obligated to respect the voters who selected them. The DNC can’t just tell them to take a hike.

            But Biden can.

            edit: AP just put out a piece that confirms what I’ve been saying. They’d be sued into oblivion if they usurped the process right now. The ball is very much in Biden’s court.

    • John Richard
      link
      fedilink
      85 months ago

      AOC would be a really strong candidate. The right would freak out and she’d end up getting more press coverage than Trump. I imagine she’d make several Republican’s embolisms pop.

      • @Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        135 months ago

        Yes, she’s probably the only one with enough name recognition and veracity to take on the orange moron in my opinion. Problem is corporate Democrats wouldn’t back her because she’s too progressive and that goes against their corporate masters.

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          95 months ago

          True… However if Trump gets elected and our government is able to prevent a dictatorship, in 4 years progressives will hopefully realize the DNC needs them more than they need need the DNC.

          • @eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            55 months ago

            in 4 years progressives will hopefully realize the DNC needs them more than they need need the DNC.

            the progressives already know that the dnc needs them more than they need the dnc as evidenced by dnc surrogates perpetually shaming progressives for not voting for the dnc; i’m guessing there’s a typo in your sentence somewhere, but i’m not sure where.

            • John Richard
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              If the progressives truly thought that then the US would have a much different stance in regards to Israel.