• @exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    304 months ago

    Just signed up today for the family plan in my ongoing degoogling process

    It’s a bit pricey but so far loving it. Specially Proton Pass, coming from bitwarden (which I liked), it’s nicer and faster, much faster

    • @BenPranklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      50
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Don’t put all your eggs in one basket again, that’s what makes degoogling such a difficult thing. There’s several proton services I intentionally avoid and use alternatives for so I don’t have to uproot my entire digital life to leave them if they start being shitty. If you go from using all google services to all proton you’re setting yourself up to need the same sort of big migration down the road. 15 years ago google was also an awesome company that kept making incredibly useful things for users just because they could and look at them now.

    • John Richard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 months ago

      And so what happens to your passwords if Proton were to go offline and you needed to continue using Proton Pass? Do they have an open source server you can use like Bitwarden does or vaultwarden? Or are you essentially locking yourself into a new walled garden for no reason other than name recognition? Why not just use KeePassXC which is encrypted locally rather than share your password with a third party who can easily capture your private key password?

      • @nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think a lot of these cloud-based password vaults will have a local database that syncs with the cloud. I think you can unlock them and access your passwords without internet access

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Keyword… unlock, not add information or use them offline where they can sync to an open source backend. They are cloud-based password managers that are designed to operate online. The backend is not open source. It is designed to lock you into a walled garden.

          • @nutsack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The unlocking happens locally. it’s simply decrypting. also, i think you can export the data from proton pass.

            it’s a cloud solution. keepassxc works great and I don’t know why you want something else to replace it

            • @ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              Browser integration with quality biometric login is a beautiful thing. Keepass’ implementation of both is trash, and keepassxc’s browser integration may actually be worse than the original.

              That having been said I always recommend to people they use two managers, with keepass being the secure base for things you don’t often need convenient access to like savings accounts, password manager passwords, tax services, etc.

              bitwarden, proton, et al I use for the day-to-day…I don’t give any fucks if my Lemmy account is lost for example.

        • @ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          “A walled garden is a garden enclosed by high walls, especially when this is done for horticultural rather than security purposes, although originally all gardens may have been enclosed for protection from animal or human intruders.”

          Agreed proton isn’t this

          "A closed platform, walled garden, or closed ecosystem[1][2] is a software system wherein the carrier or service provider has control over applications, content, and/or media, and restricts convenient access to non-approved applicants or content. "

          Try using thunderbird and id argue proton is this

          • @asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Still, that seems like a combo of “comes with the territory of encrypted email” and “their software could use some major improvements”. I think closed platform is closed by design.

            • @dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              comes with the territory of encrypted email

              AFAIK they haven’t tried to standardize their implementation, which to me implies that they’re not interested in interoperability. That’s unfortunate. I wouldn’t want to be locked in to a vendor like that.

              At least some providers do try. FastMail published the spec for their modern, stateless replacement to IMAP through the IETF as “JMAP”, and built on top of existing RFCs where possible.

            • @ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              Nah, fundamentally proton uses the same encryption as everyone else, they just have a central server to exchange keys rather than one of the open servers.

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          It will cache credentials for a short time so you can still access some of your passwords. It will not let you add new credentials. It’s like a web browser working in offline mode for a period of time. It is a cloud-based password manager with a closed-source server backend.

    • @Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      My only gripe with Proton Pass so far is that I’m used to Bitwarden’s right-click autofill menu and some sites’ 2FA codes don’t automatically pop up for some reason.

    • @ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Does pass support custom url filters yet? I self host and so I have a lot of 192.168 bookmarks…when I tried pass it had no way to organize them by url prefix (port number).