• Travelers can opt out of facial recognition at US airports by requesting manual ID verification, though resistance or intimidation may occur.
  • Facial recognition poses privacy risks, including potential data breaches, misidentification, and normalization of surveillance.
  • The Algorithmic Justice League’s “Freedom Flyers” campaign aims to raise awareness of these issues and encourage passengers to exercise their right to opt out.
  • CyaL8r@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s not what the other user is saying - we have to fight to keep what rights we have, and maybe one day gain some of the ones we lost

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Their message is correct but they’re mad at that “calm down” part and addressed it poorly

      User 1: if you fly using a passport, the government knows what you look like, whether or not you opt out of facial recognition, being a Karen at the airport won’t help with you

      User 2: Fuck that, if we are complacent, more privacy will be taken away from us

      User 3: You can’t fly without a photo id

      Seems to me the user you responded to knows what they are saying, and you’re both right. You don’t have a right to fly on an airplane without a legal verification of who you are. We should have a right to verify our identity without facial recognition software. But that happens with laws, not making scenes at airports

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Honestly, we should have a right to fly w/o providing ID as well. I don’t need it to ride the bus or local train, and I don’t think I need it for a greyhound bus (if I pay w/ cash). I’ve heard you can maybe get away w/o ID on Amtrak, but their official policy says it’s required.

        So why are airplanes so different? Fatalities per mile on airplanes are among the lowest of any form of transportation, so I highly doubt terrorism is a significant, statistically relevant factor here. I think they do it because they can, not because it actually helps reduce risk in any meaningful way. I don’t see any basis for needing an ID for any form of mass transit, you should only need it for driving to prove that you have the privilege to do so.

        I really don’t understand why law enforcement is so infatuated with checking my ID…